[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] Re: pan and gmime 2.4.0
From: |
Duncan |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] Re: pan and gmime 2.4.0 |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:53:54 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) |
George Sherwood <address@hidden> posted
address@hidden, excerpted below, on Fri, 10 Oct
2008 07:34:19 -0500:
> Duncan,
> Have you heard anything on this? Do you know if Gentoo is getting
> close to unmasking gmime 2.4.0?
I haven't, but I've been busy working on other bugs of late (kernel
2.6.27 was a tough one for me, and I've been working on a couple openrc
bugs too).
However, I see gmime-2.4.1 is in the tree, masked (as you hinted) now.
The tracker bug referenced is
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=239412
It doesn't appear they're doing anything to try to patch the actual
package sources to work with the new gmime, just slotting gmime and
making the packages dependent on the appropriate slot, until upstream
fixes the packages. There's a pan ebuild patch on that bug, but that's
all it's effectively doing, too.
So IOW don't expect much pan sources patch help from Gentoo on this one,
as they'll have both gmime versions installed and setup their packages
including pan to depend on whichever one they need.
I /did/ see a change on a gnome/pan bug I'm CCed to from Charles a couple
days ago, tho, so if we're lucky he's coming back from his long hiatus.
It was just a dup notification on that (fixed in 0.133) *.nzb security
bug, tho, which isn't by itself indication of much activity. (I've not
updated my svn version in a couple weeks due to the business mentioned
above... maybe if I did it'd show activity there? I suppose I should...)
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman