[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?
From: |
Robert Marshall |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ? |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 08:22:27 +0000 |
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Petr Kovar wrote:
> So to sum it up, what would it take to roll out a new release and
> distribute it to users via standard channels...
>
> First off, someone who eventually takes the responsibility to do the
> release needs to have a GNOME developer account with write access to
> ftp.gnome.org, and also Pan website (quite easily obtainable given
> Charles' consent, that is).
>
> Second, one needs to merge K Haley's appropriate branch (I believe
> this is called 'testing' in the github.com repository, please
> correct me if I'm wrong) with the master branch in the Pan official
> repository at git.gnome.org.
>
> Third, do the actual release, tag it in the repository, make
> tarball, install it to ftp.gnome.org.
>
> Fourth, update the Pan website accordingly, send out announcement
> message about the new release.
>
> One's done. Now packagers need to pick up on one's work, make a
> package update with new release and distribute it to their
> users. This includes the Pan installer for Windows done by Steve
> Davies.
>
> As I said before, having a developer account, I'm willing to help
> out with that process, but I need someone with real knowledge of C++
> to back it up. (Winking at K Haley here.) :-)
>
I have - a frightening - 20+ years of c++ experience but am very bad at
persisting with things. I also only use pan for a few newsgroups (mainly
binaries) and never use it for posting. I use gnus for most newsgroup
reading - so any testing would only be a subset of the whole except when
spurred to dig into the neighbourhood of a bug.
My experience with X api's is also Qt rather than gtk
The above doesn't mean I couldn't express an occasional interest though!
Robert
--
Links and things http://rmstar.blogspot.com/
Robert Marshall
- [Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?, (continued)
- [Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?, Petr Kovar, 2011/01/16
- [Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?, Petr Kovar, 2011/01/16
- [Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?, Duncan, 2011/01/17
- [Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?, Petr Kovar, 2011/01/24
- [Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?, Duncan, 2011/01/24
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?, K. Haley, 2011/01/25
- [Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?, Duncan, 2011/01/25
- [Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?, walt, 2011/01/25
- [Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?, Duncan, 2011/01/26
- [Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?, Petr Kovar, 2011/01/30
- [Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?,
Robert Marshall <=
- [Pan-users] 0.134 pre-release (was: New version of pan ?), Petr Kovar, 2011/01/24
- Re: [Pan-users] 0.134 pre-release, Heinrich Mueller, 2011/01/25
- [Pan-users] Re: 0.134 pre-release (was: New version of pan ?), Lacrocivious Acrophosist, 2011/01/25
- [Pan-users] Re: 0.134 pre-release (was: New version of pan ?), Robert Marshall, 2011/01/28
[Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?, Maurice Batey, 2011/01/15
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?, Brad Rogers, 2011/01/15
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?, Rui Maciel, 2011/01/15
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?, Brad Rogers, 2011/01/15
- [Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?, Duncan, 2011/01/16
- [Pan-users] Re: New version of pan ?, David Shochat, 2011/01/16