Re: Added PK_MI_REQ_PRINTV request for MI.

[Jose E. Marchesi]

> On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 11:01:31PM +0200, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
>> 
>> >> Isn't that supposed to be __pkl_mi_value?
>> >> How are you testing this btw?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Yes, its supposed to be __pkl_mi_value.
>> 
>> Ok, with that fixed this is OK for master.
>> 
>> However, before adding new messages to the MI protocol, we better add a
>> suitable test harness.  I think Mohammad has some ideas for that.
>> 
>
> I have a Python script to test the MI interactions (which I showed Kostas
> a few days ago (over Jitsi)), but due to your excessive love for Python
> I don't have any plan to make it upstream :)
>
> I also have a half-written implementation in C (which like the Python script,
> runs `poke` MI tests in parallel). I'll send a patch for that when it gets
> ready.
>
> But meanwhile, I suggest to use that Python script as an "unofficial"
> test harness and experimentation platform until I complete the C 
> implementation.
> (And to keep you happy, I'll share that script only with Kostas :D) 
>
> WDYT?

Sounds good! :)