[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC 0/8] Introduce an extensible static analyzer
From: |
Alberto Faria |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC 0/8] Introduce an extensible static analyzer |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Jul 2022 10:56:50 +0100 |
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 5:13 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> FWIW, after applying this series 'make check' throws lots of failures
> and hangs for me in the block I/O tests, so something appears not quite
> correct here. I didn't bother to investigate/debug since you marked this
> as just an RFC
Thanks, it appears some coroutine_fn functions are being called from
non-coroutine context, so some call conversions from bdrv_... to
bdrv_co_... introduce problems. These changes are only intended as
examples of using the tool for the time being.
Alberto
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Introduce an extensible static analyzer, (continued)
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Introduce an extensible static analyzer, Paolo Bonzini, 2022/07/02
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Introduce an extensible static analyzer, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2022/07/04
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Introduce an extensible static analyzer, Alberto Faria, 2022/07/04
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Introduce an extensible static analyzer, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2022/07/05
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Introduce an extensible static analyzer, Alberto Faria, 2022/07/05
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Introduce an extensible static analyzer, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2022/07/05
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Introduce an extensible static analyzer, Alberto Faria, 2022/07/06
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Introduce an extensible static analyzer, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2022/07/06
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Introduce an extensible static analyzer, Alberto Faria, 2022/07/08
Re: [RFC 0/8] Introduce an extensible static analyzer, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2022/07/05
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Introduce an extensible static analyzer,
Alberto Faria <=