Re: [PATCH v9 05/21] job.c: add job_lock/unlock while keeping job.h intact

[Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito]

Am 08/07/2022 um 21:25 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
>>   static bool job_started(Job *job)
> 
> So we can call it both with mutex locked and without. Hope it never race
> with job_start.

Where exactly do you see it called with mutex not held?

I don't see it anywhere, and if you agree too, we should rename it in
_locked.

Emanuele