[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU License and proprietary hardware
From: |
Balazs Attila-Mihaly \(Cd-MaN\) |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU License and proprietary hardware |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:34:55 -0700 (PDT) |
I must prefix this with the fact that IANAL, but as I understand it, you must
release the source code only if you distribute that modified system (with GPL
v2). That is, if you use this system internally in you company, you don't have
to provide your modifications. But if you, for example, provide your clients
with the modified version, you have the obligation to provide them (your
clients, not the Qemu community in general) also with the complete source code,
after which they have the liberty to redistribute the source code under the
GPL. One solution would be (again, IANAL, so please check with a real lawyer
:D), is to create an interface to the code you wish to include and put the
proprietary code in a dynamically linked library which exposes this interface.
In this case IMHO you have to provide only the code which implements the
interface in Qemu and loads the shared library, and you would have no
obligation regarding the code in the shared library.
----- Original Message ----
From: Armbrost Failsafe <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Sent: Thursday, 21 June, 2007 2:28:53 PM
Subject: [Qemu-devel] QEMU License and proprietary hardware
We are looking into using QEMU as the base for a model of a custom system
featuring some custom ASICs. But licensing issues are halting the process right
now. Does anyone know what happens license-wise if we create a model of
proprietary hardware using QEMU? Is that model automatically covered by the GPL
and thus we have to give to anyone who asks about it? It is clear that if we
keep it internal, it is OK. But anyone outside of our organization is to use
it, shouldn't they automatically be entitled to receive the entire source of
QEMU, including our models of proprietary devices? Even if these are developed
from scratch without using any existing source code for devices?
/armbrost
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for
your free account today
http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail/winter07.html
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU License and proprietary hardware, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU License and proprietary hardware, Warner Losh, 2007/06/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU License and proprietary hardware, Luke -Jr, 2007/06/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU License and proprietary hardware, M. Warner Losh, 2007/06/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU License and proprietary hardware, Luke -Jr, 2007/06/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU License and proprietary hardware, M. Warner Losh, 2007/06/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU License and proprietary hardware, Johannes Schindelin, 2007/06/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU License and proprietary hardware, Luke -Jr, 2007/06/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU License and proprietary hardware, Johannes Schindelin, 2007/06/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU License and proprietary hardware, Ronnie Misra, 2007/06/22
Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU License and proprietary hardware, Paul Brook, 2007/06/24
Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU License and proprietary hardware,
Balazs Attila-Mihaly \(Cd-MaN\) <=