[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] More than 2G of memory on 64-bit hosts
From: |
Thiemo Seufer |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] More than 2G of memory on 64-bit hosts |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:32:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Marius Groeger wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Julian Seward wrote:
>
> > > > In Valgrind-world we use an alternative approach, which is to typedef
> > > > a set of new integral types and use those exclusively, and not use the
> > > > native 'int', 'long' etc. The new types have a single fixed meaning
> > > > regardless of the host or guest and it is up to the configure script
> > > > to set up suitable typedefs. At startup Valgrind checks the size and
> > > > signedness of these types is as expected, so any configuration errors
> > > > are caught. This has proved very helpful in porting to a number of
> > > > platforms.
> >
> > So in this particular case we have the types UWord and Word
> > (unsigned and signed machine words) which it is guaranteed are
> > the same size as void*, on all platforms.
> >
> > We also capitalise the first letter of all type names as that
> > makes the code easier to read and makes it obvious when you are
> > inadvertantly using the native 'int', 'long' etc.
>
> FWIW, any C code defining such types with a "single fixed meaning"
> should use very(!) distinct prefixes to keep those identifiers within
> their own namespace. From what I can tell having done quite a lot of
> porting and component integration of C code, capitalization is
> definitely not enough to ensure self-containedness of your code. :-)
Indeed. We have already host_ and target_ prefixes in some places, which
are IMHO a natural choice for a naming convention.
Thiemo
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] More than 2G of memory on 64-bit hosts, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] More than 2G of memory on 64-bit hosts, Blue Swirl, 2007/06/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] More than 2G of memory on 64-bit hosts, Michal Schulz, 2007/06/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] More than 2G of memory on 64-bit hosts, Karl Magdsick, 2007/06/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] More than 2G of memory on 64-bit hosts, Thiemo Seufer, 2007/06/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] More than 2G of memory on 64-bit hosts, Paul Brook, 2007/06/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] More than 2G of memory on 64-bit hosts, Blue Swirl, 2007/06/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] More than 2G of memory on 64-bit hosts, Julian Seward, 2007/06/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] More than 2G of memory on 64-bit hosts, Thiemo Seufer, 2007/06/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] More than 2G of memory on 64-bit hosts, Julian Seward, 2007/06/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] More than 2G of memory on 64-bit hosts, Marius Groeger, 2007/06/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] More than 2G of memory on 64-bit hosts,
Thiemo Seufer <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] More than 2G of memory on 64-bit hosts, Gwenole Beauchesne, 2007/06/29
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] More than 2G of memory on 64-bit hosts, Thiemo Seufer, 2007/06/25