|
From: | Gerd Hoffmann |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/9] Virtio cleanups |
Date: | Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:11:43 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
On 03/23/10 11:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I'm not sure what we should do for command line syntax. We can keep -drive working as is. Do we need to support -device based creation? I don't think we've really considered what to do in a situation like this.
If we need to change command line because of an implementation change, IMO something is wrong with the design. Users shouldn't care about non-existent virtio bus.
You can automagically create the virtio devices on the virtio bus, passing through any properties. usb-storage does this for example with the scsi-disk device it needs. But then you can't have a generic virtio-pci device any more. You need a virtio-blk-pci which creates a virtio-bus and virtio-blk. So it doesn't buy us much over the current situation ...
cheers, Gerd
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |