|
From: | Jes Sorensen |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Mar 23 |
Date: | Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:56:36 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
On 03/23/10 13:45, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I don't think we can pull in: - extboot - ia64 - in-kernel pit[1] - associated command line options - device passthrough The question is, if we dropped those things, would people actually use qemu.git instead of qemu-kvm.git. If the answer is "no", what set of things do we need in order for people to focus on qemu.git instead of qemu-kvm.git.
I am not sure if anyone is still actively working on ia64. According to the qemu-kvm.git logs, there hasn't been any real ia64 changes to the code since my last commit in June of last year and then a couple of minor configure bits. IMHO we can just let it rot - not sure if Xiantao is still interested? Cheers, Jes
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |