Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 7/7] hw/i386/pc_q35: advertise broadcast SMI if VCPU hotplug is turned off

[Eduardo Habkost]

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 12/01/16 20:13, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 06:06:24PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> For the time being, we cannot handle SMIs in OVMF if VCPUs can show up
> >> after boot. Otherwise, advertise ICH9_LPC_SMI_F_BROADCAST.
> >>
> >> Implement this generally, by introducing a new PCMachineClass method,
> >> namely get_smi_host_features(), and implement the above logic for
> >> pc-q35-2.9 and later. The idea is that future machine types might want to
> >> calculate (the same or different) SMI host features from different
> >> information, and that shouldn't affect earlier machine types.
> >>
> >> In turn, validating guest feature requests (inter-feature dependencies)
> >> should be possible purely based on the available host feature set. For
> >> example, in the future we might enforce that the guest select
> >> ICH9_LPC_SMI_F_VCPU_PARKING as a prerequisite for
> >> ICH9_LPC_SMI_F_BROADCAST, but only if the machine type itself advertises
> >> ICH9_LPC_SMI_F_VCPU_PARKING.
> >>
> >> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden>
> >> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
> >> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <address@hidden>
> >> Cc: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> >> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> >> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >>  include/hw/i386/pc.h |  1 +
> >>  hw/i386/pc_q35.c     | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/pc.h b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> >> index 430735e501dd..e164947116b6 100644
> >> --- a/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> >> +++ b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> >> @@ -116,10 +116,11 @@ struct PCMachineClass {
> >>      /*< public >*/
> >>  
> >>      /* Methods: */
> >>      HotplugHandler *(*get_hotplug_handler)(MachineState *machine,
> >>                                             DeviceState *dev);
> >> +    uint64_t (*get_smi_host_features)(void);
> > 
> > I'd prefer to encode the differences between machine-types as
> > data, instead of code, to make introspection easier in the
> > future. Is it possible to encode this in a simple PCMachineClass
> > struct data field or (even bettter) a QOM property?
> > 
> 
> I don't know how else to capture the (smp_cpus == max_cpus) question,
> for saying that "this machine type supports SMI broadcast, as long as
> VCPU hotplug is disabled in the configuration".
> 
> Technically we could give PCMC two new (data) fields, a host features
> bitmap for when VCPU hotplug is enabled, and another for when VCPU
> hotplug is disabled. Then board code would take the right field and pass
> it on to ich9_lpc_pm_init().

It's more complex than I expected, but I would still prefer that
than having a growing collection of get_smi_host_features()
functions.

However, I am not strongly against the function pointer if others
want to avoid the complexity of two extra bitmaps.

-- 
Eduardo