qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] ppc: Fix MMU model values needed by PR KVM


From: Sam Bobroff
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] ppc: Fix MMU model values needed by PR KVM
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 15:42:49 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

Ping?

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 08:07:25AM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 21/07/16 06:55, Sam Bobroff wrote:
> 
> > Commit 4322e8c "ppc: Fix 64K pages support in full emulation" added
> > the POWERPC_MMU_64K flag to the POWERPC_MMU_2_06 and POWERPC_MMU_2_07
> > definitions but not to their "degraded" variants. When running with PR
> > KVM, kvm_fixup_page_sizes() removes the POWERPC_MMU_1TSEG flag from
> > the MMU value then later ppc_tlb_invalidate_all() expects the value to
> > be one from the list, but it isn't because the POWERPC_MMU_64K bit is
> > missing from the (otherwise) matching "degraded" entry. This causes
> > QEMU to exit with "fatal: Unknown MMU model".
> > 
> > This patch adds the POWERPC_MMU_64K flag to the POWERPC_MMU_2_06a and
> > POWERPC_MMU_2_07a values, preventing the error.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > I recently discovered that I can't start QEMU with KVM PR for modern
> > pseries machines:
> > 
> > $ rmmod kvm_hv
> > $ modprobe kvm-pr
> > $ qemu-system-ppc64 -nographic -vga none -machine pseries,accel=kvm
> > qemu: fatal: Unknown MMU model
> > 
> > A quick investigation seems to indicate that it's just a missing flag
> > in the MMU definition. If it's really that simple then here's a patch
> > for it.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Sam.
> > 
> >  target-ppc/cpu-qom.h | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/target-ppc/cpu-qom.h b/target-ppc/cpu-qom.h
> > index 2864105..0f1e011 100644
> > --- a/target-ppc/cpu-qom.h
> > +++ b/target-ppc/cpu-qom.h
> > @@ -71,6 +71,10 @@ enum powerpc_mmu_t {
> >  #define POWERPC_MMU_1TSEG    0x00020000
> >  #define POWERPC_MMU_AMR      0x00040000
> >  #define POWERPC_MMU_64K      0x00080000
> > +/* Any entry that include POWERPC_MMU_1TSEG must have a matching
> > + * entry without it, because it may be removed by
> > + * kvm_fixup_page_sizes() and the new value must exist here.
> > + * See ppc_tlb_invalidate_*(). */
> >      /* 64 bits PowerPC MMU                                     */
> >      POWERPC_MMU_64B        = POWERPC_MMU_64 | 0x00000001,
> >      /* Architecture 2.03 and later (has LPCR) */
> > @@ -81,6 +85,7 @@ enum powerpc_mmu_t {
> >                               | POWERPC_MMU_AMR | 0x00000003,
> >      /* Architecture 2.06 "degraded" (no 1T segments)           */
> >      POWERPC_MMU_2_06a      = POWERPC_MMU_64 | POWERPC_MMU_AMR
> > +                             | POWERPC_MMU_64K
> >                               | 0x00000003,
> >      /* Architecture 2.07 variant                               */
> >      POWERPC_MMU_2_07       = POWERPC_MMU_64 | POWERPC_MMU_1TSEG
> > @@ -88,6 +93,7 @@ enum powerpc_mmu_t {
> >                               | POWERPC_MMU_AMR | 0x00000004,
> >      /* Architecture 2.07 "degraded" (no 1T segments)           */
> >      POWERPC_MMU_2_07a      = POWERPC_MMU_64 | POWERPC_MMU_AMR
> > +                             | POWERPC_MMU_64K
> >                               | 0x00000004,
> >  };
> >  
> > 
> 
> Added David as CC to make sure it gets caught by a PPC maintainer.
> 
> 
> ATB,
> 
> Mark.
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]