qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] backup: allow target without .bdrv_get_info


From: Fam Zheng
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] backup: allow target without .bdrv_get_info
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:05:39 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)

On Tue, 02/14 17:48, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Currently backup to nbd target is broken, as nbd doesn't have
> .bdrv_get_info realization.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden>
> ---
> 
> Hi all!
> 
> Since commit
> 
> commit 4c9bca7e39a6e07ad02c1dcde3478363344ec60b
> Author: John Snow <address@hidden>
> Date:   Thu Feb 25 15:58:30 2016 -0500
> 
>     block/backup: avoid copying less than full target clusters
> 
> backup to nbd target is broken, we have "Couldn't determine the cluster size 
> of
> the target image".
> 
> Proposed NBD protocol extension - NBD_OPT_INFO should finally solve this 
> problem.
> But until it is not realized, we need allow backup to nbd target due to 
> backward
> compatibility.
> 
> Furthermore, is it entirely ok to disallow backup if bds lacks .bdrv_get_info?
> Which behavior should be default: to fail backup or to use default cluster 
> size?
> 
>  block/backup.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/backup.c b/block/backup.c
> index ea38733..095a390 100644
> --- a/block/backup.c
> +++ b/block/backup.c
> @@ -638,7 +638,10 @@ BlockJob *backup_job_create(const char *job_id, 
> BlockDriverState *bs,
>       * backup cluster size is smaller than the target cluster size. Even for
>       * targets with a backing file, try to avoid COW if possible. */
>      ret = bdrv_get_info(target, &bdi);
> -    if (ret < 0 && !target->backing) {
> +    if (ret == -ENOTSUP) {
> +        /* Cluster size is not defined */
> +        job->cluster_size = BACKUP_CLUSTER_SIZE_DEFAULT;
> +    } else if (ret < 0 && !target->backing) {
>          error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
>              "Couldn't determine the cluster size of the target image, "
>              "which has no backing file");
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 

Target not having .bdrv_get_info means 'some sane assumptions are okay' to me, 
so

Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>

(But we are going to have a .bdrv_get_info after NBD_OPT_INFO, right?)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]