[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hostmem: fix crash when querying empty host-nod
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hostmem: fix crash when querying empty host-nodes property via QMP |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Feb 2019 11:56:03 +0100 |
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:30:55 +0100
Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
> Igor Mammedov <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > QEMU will crashes with
> > qapi/qobject-output-visitor.c:210: qobject_output_complete: Assertion
> > `qov->root && ((&qov->stack)->slh_first == ((void *)0))' failed
> > when trying to get value of empty hostmem.host-nodes property.
> >
> > Fix it by calling visitor even if host-nodes wasn't set
> > before exiting from property getter to return empty list.
>
> host-nodes or host_nodes?
>
> If local variable host_nodes: that one's always set. The case you fix
> has it set to NULL.
it's about property host-nodes:
value = find_first_bit(backend->host_nodes, MAX_NODES);
if (value == MAX_NODES) {
goto ret;
}
when no bits set, it exits without visiting being returned list.
I'll send v2 with commit message giving more explanation to make
it clearer.
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > backends/hostmem.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/backends/hostmem.c b/backends/hostmem.c
> > index 0c8ef17..fe14be5 100644
> > --- a/backends/hostmem.c
> > +++ b/backends/hostmem.c
> > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes(Object *obj, Visitor
> > *v, const char *name,
> >
> > value = find_first_bit(backend->host_nodes, MAX_NODES);
> > if (value == MAX_NODES) {
> > - return;
> > + goto ret;
> > }
> >
> > *node = g_malloc0(sizeof(**node));
> > @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes(Object *obj, Visitor
> > *v, const char *name,
> > node = &(*node)->next;
> > } while (true);
> >
> > +ret:
> > visit_type_uint16List(v, name, &host_nodes, errp);
> > }
>
> Yes, an empty list needs to be visited just like a non-empty list.
>
> Patch looks good.
>