Re: [RFC v7 15/22] cpu: Move tlb_fill to tcg_ops

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

On 12/4/20 6:37 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 06:14:07PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 11/30/20 3:35 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>>> From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>  accel/tcg/cputlb.c              |  6 +++---
>>>  accel/tcg/user-exec.c           |  6 +++---
>>>  include/hw/core/cpu.h           |  9 ---------
>>>  include/hw/core/tcg-cpu-ops.h   | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>  target/alpha/cpu.c              |  2 +-
>>>  target/arm/cpu.c                |  2 +-
>>>  target/avr/cpu.c                |  2 +-
>>>  target/cris/cpu.c               |  2 +-
>>>  target/hppa/cpu.c               |  2 +-
>>>  target/i386/tcg-cpu.c           |  2 +-
>>>  target/lm32/cpu.c               |  2 +-
>>>  target/m68k/cpu.c               |  2 +-
>>>  target/microblaze/cpu.c         |  2 +-
>>>  target/mips/cpu.c               |  2 +-
>>>  target/moxie/cpu.c              |  2 +-
>>>  target/nios2/cpu.c              |  2 +-
>>>  target/openrisc/cpu.c           |  2 +-
>>>  target/ppc/translate_init.c.inc |  2 +-
>>>  target/riscv/cpu.c              |  2 +-
>>>  target/rx/cpu.c                 |  2 +-
>>>  target/s390x/cpu.c              |  2 +-
>>>  target/sh4/cpu.c                |  2 +-
>>>  target/sparc/cpu.c              |  2 +-
>>>  target/tilegx/cpu.c             |  2 +-
>>>  target/tricore/cpu.c            |  2 +-
>>>  target/unicore32/cpu.c          |  2 +-
>>>  target/xtensa/cpu.c             |  2 +-
>>>  27 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>
>> With cc->tcg_ops.* guarded with #ifdef CONFIG_TCG:
>> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Are the #ifdefs a hard condition for your Reviewed-by?

No, as you said, this is fine as a first step, so you can
include them.

> Even if we agree #ifdef CONFIG_TCG is the way to go, I don't
> think this should block a series that's a step in the right
> direction.  It can be done in a separate patch.
> 
> (Unless the lack of #ifdef introduces regressions, of course)

I'm worried about the +system -tcg build configuration.

s390x is the only target testing for such regressions
(see "[s390x] Clang (disable-tcg)" on Travis-CI.