[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v12 00/19] Initial support for multi-process Qemu
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v12 00/19] Initial support for multi-process Qemu |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:13:55 +0000 |
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 08:40:11PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 09:51, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 03:22:35PM -0500, Jagannathan Raman wrote:
> > > This is the v12 of the patchset. Thank you very much for the
> > > review of the v11 of the series.
> >
> > I'm in favor of merging this for QEMU 6.0. The command-line interface
> > has the x- prefix so QEMU is not committing to a stable interface.
> > Changes needed to support additional device types or to switch to the
> > vfio-user protocol can be made later.
> >
> > Jag, Elena, JJ: I suggest getting your GPG key to Peter Maydell so you
> > can send multi-process QEMU pull requests.
>
> I would prefer to see this going through the tree of an
> established QEMU developer who's already sending pullrequests,
> at least initially.
Once the discussion has completed I can send the patches in a pull
request.
I don't want to be the bottleneck for all multi-process QEMU patches in
the future though. That's why I think the authors should be able to send
pull requests on their own after the initial code is merged. Much of
this work is isolated an only affects multi-process QEMU and the feature
is marked experimental. There is little risk of introducing instability
for non-multi-process QEMU users/developers. Hence why this is a new
subsystem and has MAINTAINERS files entries.
Does that sound good?
Stefan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [PATCH v12 08/19] multi-process: define MPQemuMsg format and transmission functions, (continued)
Re: [PATCH v12 00/19] Initial support for multi-process Qemu, Jagannathan Raman, 2020/12/03