qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] scsi: allow user to set werror as report


From: Zihao Chang
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: allow user to set werror as report
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:39:21 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0

Ping again? Another month has passed, whose tree should it go via?
Or did I miss any response?

Thanks
Zihao

On 2020/12/3 17:53, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 12/3/20 3:55 AM, Zihao Chang wrote:
>> Ping? This is a fix patch which has been reviewed, whose tree should it go 
>> via?
> 
> The change itself is in-between 'Block layer' and 'SCSI'
> subsystems, so either Paolo or Kevin (Cc'ing qemu-block@).
> 
>>
>> Thanks
>> Zihao
>>
>> On 2020/11/3 22:03, Zihao Chang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2020/11/3 18:52, Fam Zheng wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 14:12 +0800, Zihao Chang wrote:
>>>>> 'enospc' is the default for -drive, but qemu allows user to set
>>>>> drive option werror. If werror of scsi-generic is set to 'report'
>>>>> by user, qemu will not allow vm to start.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch allow user to set werror as 'report' for scsi-generic.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zihao Chang <changzihao1@huawei.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  hw/scsi/scsi-generic.c | 3 ++-
>>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/hw/scsi/scsi-generic.c b/hw/scsi/scsi-generic.c
>>>>> index 2cb23ca891..2730e37d63 100644
>>>>> --- a/hw/scsi/scsi-generic.c
>>>>> +++ b/hw/scsi/scsi-generic.c
>>>>> @@ -664,7 +664,8 @@ static void scsi_generic_realize(SCSIDevice *s,
>>>>> Error **errp)
>>>>>          return;
>>>>>      }
>>>>>  
>>>>> -    if (blk_get_on_error(s->conf.blk, 0) !=
>>>>> BLOCKDEV_ON_ERROR_ENOSPC) {
>>>>> +    if (blk_get_on_error(s->conf.blk, 0) != BLOCKDEV_ON_ERROR_ENOSPC
>>>>> &&
>>>>> +        blk_get_on_error(s->conf.blk, 0) !=
>>>>> BLOCKDEV_ON_ERROR_REPORT) {
>>>>>          error_setg(errp, "Device doesn't support drive option
>>>>> werror");
>>>>>          return;
>>>>>      }
>>>>
>>>> Accepting the report sounds sane to me, it matches what we actually
>>>> (always) do. Is the idea to allow users to spell it out explicitly in
>>>> the command line?
>>>>
>>> Actually, qemu supports user to spell it out explicitly in the command
>>> line like "enospc", "report" & "action". This patch just allows user to
>>> set werror as "report" for scsi-generic, which is a common scenario.
>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>
>>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>
> 
> .
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]