|
From: | Thomas Huth |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/3] tests/acceptance: Move the pseries test to a separate file |
Date: | Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:30:37 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 |
On 12/01/2021 19.50, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
Hi, On 1/12/21 1:40 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:Let's gather the POWER-related tests in a separate file.Did you consider having others ppc/ppc64 boot tests together too? Some candidates: tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxPPC64.test_pseries_tcg tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_ppc64_e500 tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_ppc_g3beige tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_ppc_mac99
The e500, g3beige and mac99 tests are depending on the do_test_advcal_2018() function in that file, so I think they should rather stay there.
tests/acceptance/ppc_prep_40p.py:IbmPrep40pMachine.test_factory_firmware_and_netbsd tests/acceptance/ppc_prep_40p.py:IbmPrep40pMachine.test_openbios_192mtests/acceptance/ppc_prep_40p.py:IbmPrep40pMachine.test_openbios_and_netbsd
That's a good point, I did not notice that file when writing my patches. Philippe, since you've created this ppc_prep_40p.py file, what do you think, should it be merged with the other ppc tests, or shall we rather keep this separate?
Thomas
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |