qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] virtio-pci:add support for configure interrupt


From: Cindy Lu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] virtio-pci:add support for configure interrupt
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:08:46 +0800

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 12:43 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/1/13 下午11:45, Cindy Lu wrote:
> > Add support for configure interrupt, use kvm_irqfd_assign and set the
> > gsi to kernel. When the configure notifier was eventfd_signal by host
> > kernel, this will finally inject an msix interrupt to guest
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >   hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c         | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   include/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.h |  2 +
> >   2 files changed, 95 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> > index 36524a5728..f8053e1fab 100644
> > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> > @@ -762,6 +762,98 @@ undo:
> >       return ret;
> >   }
> >
> > + static int kvm_virtio_pci_config_irqfd_use(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy,
> > +                                 unsigned int vector)
> > +{
> > +    VirtIOIRQFD *irqfd = &proxy->vector_irqfd[vector];
> > +    VirtIODevice *vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(&proxy->bus);
> > +    EventNotifier *n = virtio_queue_get_config_notifier(vdev);
> > +    assert(irqfd);
> > +    return kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier_gsi(kvm_state, n, NULL, 
> > irqfd->virq);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void kvm_virtio_pci_config_irqfd_release(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy,
> > +                                      unsigned int vector)
> > +{
> > +    VirtIODevice *vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(&proxy->bus);
> > +    EventNotifier *n = virtio_queue_get_config_notifier(vdev);
> > +    VirtIOIRQFD *irqfd = &proxy->vector_irqfd[vector];
> > +    assert(irqfd);
> > +    kvm_irqchip_remove_irqfd_notifier_gsi(kvm_state, n, irqfd->virq);
> > +    return;
> > +}
> > +static int kvm_virtio_pci_config_vector_use(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy,
> > +                                        unsigned int vector)
> > +{
> > +    VirtIOIRQFD *irqfd = &proxy->vector_irqfd[vector];
> > +    int ret;
> > +
> > +    if (irqfd->users == 0) {
> > +        ret = kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(kvm_state, vector, 
> > &proxy->pci_dev);
> > +        if (ret < 0) {
> > +            return ret;
> > +        }
> > +        irqfd->virq = ret;
> > +    }
> > +    irqfd->users++;
> > +
> > +    return 0;
> > +}
>
>
> Any reason that we can't resue kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_use()? Note that
> at MSIX level there's no difference if it belongs to vq or config.
>
>
> > +static int kvm_virtio_pci_vector_config_use(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy)
> > +{
> > +
> > +    VirtIODevice *vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(&proxy->bus);
> > +    unsigned int vector;
> > +    int ret;
> > +    VirtioDeviceClass *k = VIRTIO_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(vdev);
> > +
> > +    vector = vdev->config_vector ;
> > +    ret = kvm_virtio_pci_config_vector_use(proxy, vector);
> > +    if (ret < 0) {
> > +        goto undo;
> > +    }
> > +    ret = kvm_virtio_pci_config_irqfd_use(proxy,  vector);
> > +    if (ret < 0) {
> > +        goto undo;
> > +    }
> > +    return 0;
> > +undo:
> > +    kvm_virtio_pci_config_irqfd_release(proxy, vector);
> > +    return ret;
> > +}
> > +static void kvm_virtio_pci_vector_config_release(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy)
> > +{
> > +    PCIDevice *dev = &proxy->pci_dev;
> > +    VirtIODevice *vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(&proxy->bus);
> > +    unsigned int vector;
> > +    VirtioDeviceClass *k = VIRTIO_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(vdev);
> > +    vector = vdev->config_vector ;
> > +    if (vector >= msix_nr_vectors_allocated(dev)) {
> > +        return;
> > +    }
> > +    kvm_virtio_pci_config_irqfd_release(proxy, vector);
> > +    kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_release(proxy, vector);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int virtio_pci_set_guest_config_notifier(DeviceState *d,  bool 
> > assign,
> > +                                         bool with_irqfd)
> > +{
> > +    VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy = to_virtio_pci_proxy(d);
> > +    VirtIODevice *vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(&proxy->bus);
> > +    EventNotifier *notifier = virtio_queue_get_config_notifier(vdev);
> > +    int r = 0;
> > +    if (assign) {
> > +        r = event_notifier_init(notifier, 1);
> > +        virtio_set_config_notifier_fd_handler(vdev, true, with_irqfd);
> > +        kvm_virtio_pci_vector_config_use(proxy);
> > +    } else {
> > +        virtio_set_config_notifier_fd_handler(vdev, false, with_irqfd);
> > +        kvm_virtio_pci_vector_config_release(proxy);
> > +        event_notifier_cleanup(notifier);
> > +    }
> > +    return r;
> > +}
>
>
> Any way to re-use virtio_pci_set_guest_notifier() here?
>
> Thanks
>
These  two functions you mentioned all have something needed such as
queue no/guest_notifier. so I created a new one.
but it's a good idea to re-organize it,  I will post a new version
>
> > +
> >   static void kvm_virtio_pci_vector_release(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, int nvqs)
> >   {
> >       PCIDevice *dev = &proxy->pci_dev;
> > @@ -2137,6 +2229,7 @@ static void virtio_pci_bus_class_init(ObjectClass 
> > *klass, void *data)
> >       k->ioeventfd_assign = virtio_pci_ioeventfd_assign;
> >       k->get_dma_as = virtio_pci_get_dma_as;
> >       k->queue_enabled = virtio_pci_queue_enabled;
> > +    k->set_config_notifiers = virtio_pci_set_guest_config_notifier;
> >   }
> >
> >   static const TypeInfo virtio_pci_bus_info = {
> > diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.h
> > index ef8abe49c5..dae81ee414 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.h
> > @@ -93,6 +93,8 @@ struct VirtioBusClass {
> >        */
> >       bool has_variable_vring_alignment;
> >       AddressSpace *(*get_dma_as)(DeviceState *d);
> > +    int (*set_config_notifiers)(DeviceState *d, bool assign, bool 
> > with_irqfd);
> > +
> >   };
> >
> >   struct VirtioBusState {
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]