qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH RESEND] hw/net: fsl_etsec: Do not reject short frames


From: Bin Meng
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] hw/net: fsl_etsec: Do not reject short frames
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:42:56 +0800

From: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>

As of today both slirp and tap networking do not pad short frames
(e.g.: an ARP packet) to the minimum frame size of 60 bytes.

If eTSEC is programmed to reject short frames, ARP requests will be
dropped, preventing the guest from becoming visible on the network.

The same issue was reported on e1000 and vmxenet3 before, see:

commit 78aeb23eded2 ("e1000: Pad short frames to minimum size (60 bytes)")
commit 40a87c6c9b11 ("vmxnet3: Pad short frames to minimum size (60 bytes)")

Ideally this should be fixed on the slirp/tap networking side to
pad short frames to the minimum frame length, but I am not sure
whether that's doable.

This commit changes to codes to ignore the RCTRL_RSF setting and
still allow receiving the short frame. The log message is updated
to mention the reject short frames functionality is unimplemented.

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
---

RESEND using correct email address

 hw/net/fsl_etsec/rings.c | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/net/fsl_etsec/rings.c b/hw/net/fsl_etsec/rings.c
index 121415a..503b4d3 100644
--- a/hw/net/fsl_etsec/rings.c
+++ b/hw/net/fsl_etsec/rings.c
@@ -502,10 +502,17 @@ ssize_t etsec_rx_ring_write(eTSEC *etsec, const uint8_t 
*buf, size_t size)
         return -1;
     }
 
+    /*
+     * Both slirp and tap networking do not pad short frames
+     * (e.g.: an ARP packet) to the minimum frame size of 60 bytes.
+     *
+     * If eTSEC is programmed to reject short frames, ARP requests
+     * will be dropped, preventing the guest from becoming visible
+     * on the network.
+     */
     if ((etsec->regs[RCTRL].value & RCTRL_RSF) && (size < 60)) {
         /* CRC is not in the packet yet, so short frame is below 60 bytes */
-        RING_DEBUG("%s: Drop short frame\n", __func__);
-        return -1;
+        RING_DEBUG("%s: Drop short frame not implemented\n", __func__);
     }
 
     rx_init_frame(etsec, buf, size);
-- 
2.7.4




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]