qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] virtiofsd: Add an option to enable/disable posix acls


From: Vivek Goyal
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] virtiofsd: Add an option to enable/disable posix acls
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:04:36 -0500

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 06:30:44PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> fuse has an option FUSE_POSIX_ACL which needs to be opted in by fuse
> server to enable posix acls.
> 
> Add virtiofsd option "-o posix_acl/no_posix_acl" to let users enable/disable
> posix acl support. By default it is disabled as of now.
> 
> Currently even if file server has not opted in for FUSE_POSIX_ACL, user can
> still query acl and set acl, and system.posix_acl_access and
> system.posix_acl_default xattrs show up listxattr response.
> 
> Miklos said this is confusing. So he said lets block and filter
> system.posix_acl_access and system.posix_acl_default xattrs in
> getxattr/setxattr/listxattr if user has explicitly disabled
> posix acls using -o no_posix_acl.

I forgot to block acl xattrs in lo_removexattr(). Will respin this patch.

Vivek

> 
> As of now continuing to keeping the existing behavior if user did not
> specify any option to disable acl support due to concerns about backward
> compatibility.
> 
> v2: block system.posix_acl_access and system.posix_acl_default xattrs
>     if user explicitly disabled acls. (Miklos)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c 
> b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> index 58d24c0010..26cdfbd1f0 100644
> --- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> @@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ struct lo_data {
>      /* An O_PATH file descriptor to /proc/self/fd/ */
>      int proc_self_fd;
>      int user_killpriv_v2, killpriv_v2;
> +    int user_posix_acl;
>  };
>  
>  static const struct fuse_opt lo_opts[] = {
> @@ -201,6 +202,8 @@ static const struct fuse_opt lo_opts[] = {
>      { "announce_submounts", offsetof(struct lo_data, announce_submounts), 1 
> },
>      { "killpriv_v2", offsetof(struct lo_data, user_killpriv_v2), 1 },
>      { "no_killpriv_v2", offsetof(struct lo_data, user_killpriv_v2), 0 },
> +    { "posix_acl", offsetof(struct lo_data, user_posix_acl), 1 },
> +    { "no_posix_acl", offsetof(struct lo_data, user_posix_acl), 0 },
>      FUSE_OPT_END
>  };
>  static bool use_syslog = false;
> @@ -661,6 +664,23 @@ static void lo_init(void *userdata, struct 
> fuse_conn_info *conn)
>          conn->want &= ~FUSE_CAP_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2;
>          lo->killpriv_v2 = 0;
>      }
> +
> +    if (lo->user_posix_acl == 1) {
> +        /*
> +         * User explicitly asked for this option. Enable it unconditionally.
> +         * If connection does not have this capability, it should fail
> +         * in fuse_lowlevel.c
> +         */
> +        fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "lo_init: enabling posix acl\n");
> +        conn->want |= FUSE_CAP_POSIX_ACL;
> +    } else {
> +        /*
> +         * Either user specified to disable posix_acl, or did not specify
> +         * anything. In both the cases do not enable posix acl.
> +         */
> +        fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "lo_init: disabling posix_acl\n");
> +        conn->want &= ~FUSE_CAP_POSIX_ACL;
> +    }
>  }
>  
>  static void lo_getattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino,
> @@ -2612,6 +2632,63 @@ static int xattr_map_server(const struct lo_data *lo, 
> const char *server_name,
>      return -ENODATA;
>  }
>  
> +static bool block_xattr(struct lo_data *lo, const char *name)
> +{
> +    /*
> +     * If user explicitly enabled posix_acl or did not provide any option,
> +     * do not block acl. Otherwise block system.posix_acl_access and
> +     * system.posix_acl_default xattrs.
> +     */
> +    if (lo->user_posix_acl) {
> +        return false;
> +    }
> +    if (!strcmp(name, "system.posix_acl_access") ||
> +        !strcmp(name, "system.posix_acl_default"))
> +            return true;
> +
> +    return false;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Returns number of bytes in xattr_list after filtering on success. This
> + * could be zero as well if nothing is left after filtering.
> + *
> + * Returns negative error code on failure.
> + * xattr_list is modified in place.
> + */
> +static int remove_blocked_xattrs(struct lo_data *lo, char *xattr_list,
> +                                 unsigned in_size)
> +{
> +    size_t out_index, in_index;
> +
> +    /*
> +     * As of now we only filter out acl xattrs. If acls are enabled or
> +     * they have not been explicitly disabled, there is nothing to
> +     * filter.
> +     */
> +    if (lo->user_posix_acl) {
> +        return in_size;
> +    }
> +
> +    out_index = 0;
> +    in_index = 0;
> +    while (in_index < in_size) {
> +        char *in_ptr = xattr_list + in_index;
> +
> +        /* Length of current attribute name */
> +        size_t in_len = strlen(xattr_list + in_index) + 1;
> +
> +        if (!block_xattr(lo, in_ptr)) {
> +            if (in_index != out_index) {
> +                memmove(xattr_list + out_index, xattr_list + in_index, 
> in_len);
> +            }
> +            out_index += in_len;
> +        }
> +        in_index += in_len;
> +     }
> +    return out_index;
> +}
> +
>  static void lo_getxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, const char *in_name,
>                          size_t size)
>  {
> @@ -2625,6 +2702,11 @@ static void lo_getxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t 
> ino, const char *in_name,
>      int saverr;
>      int fd = -1;
>  
> +    if (block_xattr(lo, in_name)) {
> +        fuse_reply_err(req, EOPNOTSUPP);
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
>      mapped_name = NULL;
>      name = in_name;
>      if (lo->xattrmap) {
> @@ -2766,7 +2848,6 @@ static void lo_listxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t 
> ino, size_t size)
>          if (ret == 0) {
>              goto out;
>          }
> -
>          if (lo->xattr_map_list) {
>              /*
>               * Map the names back, some attributes might be dropped,
> @@ -2813,6 +2894,12 @@ static void lo_listxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t 
> ino, size_t size)
>                  goto out;
>              }
>          }
> +
> +        ret = remove_blocked_xattrs(lo, value, ret);
> +        if (ret <= 0) {
> +            saverr = -ret;
> +            goto out;
> +        }
>          fuse_reply_buf(req, value, ret);
>      } else {
>          /*
> @@ -2851,6 +2938,11 @@ static void lo_setxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t 
> ino, const char *in_name,
>      int saverr;
>      int fd = -1;
>  
> +    if (block_xattr(lo, in_name)) {
> +        fuse_reply_err(req, EOPNOTSUPP);
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
>      mapped_name = NULL;
>      name = in_name;
>      if (lo->xattrmap) {
> @@ -3604,6 +3696,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>          .allow_direct_io = 0,
>          .proc_self_fd = -1,
>          .user_killpriv_v2 = -1,
> +        .user_posix_acl = -1,
>      };
>      struct lo_map_elem *root_elem;
>      struct lo_map_elem *reserve_elem;
> -- 
> 2.25.4
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]