Re: softmmu vs sysemu [Was: Re: [RFC v1 06/38] target/arm: split off cpu-softmmu.c]

[Richard Henderson]

On 2/23/21 10:18 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> I am all for "just getting it done", but here the i386 and the arm series 
> become a mixture of things that I am not comfortable with,
> I'd prefer a dedicated series..

You're thinking too deeply about the problem that I'm reporting to you about
this patch set.

I just want the file naming done correctly, while you're renaming.  That is
something you are actively changing in this patch set, so we should get it 
right.

You don't have to worry about ifdef CONFIG_SOFTMMU vs ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
within the code itself.


r~