qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: QEMU 6.2.0 and rhbz#1999878


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: QEMU 6.2.0 and rhbz#1999878
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 14:00:50 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0

On 12/3/21 1:03 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 05:35:41PM -0300, Eduardo Lima wrote:


On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 4:37 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:

     On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 04:20:23PM -0300, Eduardo Lima wrote:
     > Hi Rich,
     >
     > Can you confirm if the patch you added for qemu in Fedora has still not
     been
     > merged upstream? I could not find it on the git source tree.
     >
     > +Patch2: 0001-tcg-arm-Reduce-vector-alignment-requirement-for-NEON.patch
     > +From 1331e4eec016a295949009b4360c592401b089f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
     > +From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
     > +Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2021 10:49:25 -0700
     > +Subject: [PATCH] tcg/arm: Reduce vector alignment requirement for NEON

     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999878
     https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-09/msg01028.html

     The patch I posted wasn't correct (or meant to be), it was just a
     workaround.  However I think you're right - I don't believe the
     original problem was ever fixed.

Yes, I saw that your original patch had been replaced by this new
one I mentioned, so I thought it was the correct solution, but I
could not find this new one on the repository as well.

Oh I see, it was indeed replaced by Richard Henderson's patch:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qemu/blob/rawhide/f/0001-tcg-arm-Reduce-vector-alignment-requirement-for-NEON.patch

At the moment I kept it as part of 6.2.0 build, which I am just about to push
to rawhide. It builds locally, and I am only waiting for the scratch-build to
finish.

Yes looks like we need to keep it, and get it upstream too.

Whoops.  That dropped through the cracks.
I'll queue that now-ish.


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]