qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH RFC] MAINTAINERS: split out s390x sections


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] MAINTAINERS: split out s390x sections
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 20:27:07 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0

On 20.12.21 12:54, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> Split out some more specialized devices etc., so that we can build
> smarter lists of people to be put on cc: in the future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
> As discussed offlist. Some notes:
> - The new sections have inherited the maintainers of the sections
>   they have been split out of (except where people had already
>   volunteered). That's easy to change, obviously, and I hope that
>   the cc: list already contains people who might have interest in
>   volunteering for some sections.
> - I may not have gotten the F: patterns correct, please double check.
> - I'm also not sure about where in the MAINTAINERS file the new
>   sections should go; if you have a better idea, please speak up.
> - Also, if you have better ideas regarding the sections, please
>   speak up as well :)
> - Pull requests will probably continue the same way as now (i.e.
>   patches picked up at the top level and then sent, except for some
>   things like tcg which may go separately.) Not sure if it would
>   make sense to try out the submaintainer pull request model again,
>   I don't think it made life easier in the past, and now we have
>   the b4 tool to pick patches easily anyway. It might be a good
>   idea to check which of the tree locations should stay, or if we
>   want to have new ones.
> 
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 9a8d1bdf727d..d1916f075386 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -297,7 +297,6 @@ M: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>  S: Maintained
>  F: target/s390x/
>  F: target/s390x/tcg
> -F: target/s390x/cpu_models_*.[ch]
>  F: hw/s390x/
>  F: disas/s390.c
>  F: tests/tcg/s390x/
> @@ -396,16 +395,10 @@ M: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
>  M: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
>  S: Supported
>  F: target/s390x/kvm/
> -F: target/s390x/ioinst.[ch]
>  F: target/s390x/machine.c
>  F: target/s390x/sigp.c
> -F: target/s390x/cpu_features*.[ch]
> -F: target/s390x/cpu_models.[ch]
>  F: hw/s390x/pv.c
>  F: include/hw/s390x/pv.h
> -F: hw/intc/s390_flic.c
> -F: hw/intc/s390_flic_kvm.c
> -F: include/hw/s390x/s390_flic.h
>  F: gdb-xml/s390*.xml
>  T: git https://github.com/borntraeger/qemu.git s390-next
>  L: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
> @@ -1529,12 +1522,8 @@ S390 Virtio-ccw
>  M: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
>  M: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
>  S: Supported
> -F: hw/char/sclp*.[hc]
> -F: hw/char/terminal3270.c
>  F: hw/s390x/
>  F: include/hw/s390x/
> -F: hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288.c
> -F: include/hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288.h
>  F: configs/devices/s390x-softmmu/default.mak
>  F: tests/avocado/machine_s390_ccw_virtio.py
>  T: git https://github.com/borntraeger/qemu.git s390-next
> @@ -1559,6 +1548,80 @@ F: hw/s390x/s390-pci*
>  F: include/hw/s390x/s390-pci*
>  L: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
>  
> +S390 channel subsystem
> +M: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> +M: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> +S: Supported
> +F: hw/s390x/ccw-device.[ch]
> +F: hw/s390x/css.c
> +F: hw/s390x/css-bridge.c
> +F: include/hw/s390x/css.h
> +F: include/hw/s390x/css-bridge.h
> +F: include/hw/s390x/ioinst.h
> +F: target/s390x/ioinst.c
> +L: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
> +
> +3270 device
> +M: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> +M: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> +S: Odd fixes
> +F: include/hw/s390x/3270-ccw.h
> +F: hw/char/terminal3270.c
> +F: hw/s390x/3270-ccw.c
> +L: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
> +
> +diag 288 watchdog
> +M: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> +M: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> +S: Supported
> +F: hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288.c
> +F: include/hw/watchdog/wdt_diag288.h
> +L: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
> +
> +S390 CPU models
> +M: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> +S: Maintained
> +F: target/s390x/cpu_features*.[ch]
> +F: target/s390x/cpu_models.[ch]
> +L: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
> +
> +S390 storage key device
> +M: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> +M: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> +S: Supported
> +F: hw/s390x/storage-keys.h
> +F: hw/390x/s390-skeys*.c
> +L: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
> +
> +S390 storage attribute device
> +M: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> +M: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> +S: Supported
> +F: hw/s390x/storage-attributes.h
> +F: hw/s390/s390-stattrib*.c
> +L: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
> +
> +S390 SCLP-backed devices
> +M: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> +M: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> +S: Supported
> +F: include/hw/s390x/event-facility.h
> +F: include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> +F: hw/char/sclp*.[hc]
> +F: hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> +F: hw/s390x/sclp*.c
> +L: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
> +
> +S390 floating interrupt controller
> +M: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> +M: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> +M: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> +S: Supported
> +F: hw/intc/s390_flic.c
> +F: hw/intc/s390_flic_kvm.c
> +F: include/hw/s390x/s390_flic.h
> +L: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
> +
>  X86 Machines
>  ------------
>  PC
> @@ -1957,6 +2020,7 @@ M: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
>  S: Supported
>  F: hw/s390x/virtio-ccw*.[hc]
>  F: hw/s390x/vhost-vsock-ccw.c
> +F: hw/s390x/vhost-user-fs-ccw.c
>  T: git https://gitlab.com/cohuck/qemu.git s390-next
>  T: git https://github.com/borntraeger/qemu.git s390-next
>  L: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]