[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH -V2 1/4] target-ppc: Update slb array with correct ind
From: |
Aneesh Kumar K.V |
Subject: |
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH -V2 1/4] target-ppc: Update slb array with correct index values. |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:19:23 +0530 |
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <address@hidden>
Without this, a value of rb=0 and rs=0 results in replacing the 0th
index. This can be observed when using gdb remote debugging support.
(gdb) x/10i do_fork
0xc000000000085330 <do_fork>: Cannot access memory at address
0xc000000000085330
(gdb)
This is because when we do the slb sync via kvm_cpu_synchronize_state,
we overwrite the slb entry (0th entry) for 0xc000000000085330
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <address@hidden>
---
target-ppc/kvm.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-ppc/kvm.c b/target-ppc/kvm.c
index 30a870e..a629447 100644
--- a/target-ppc/kvm.c
+++ b/target-ppc/kvm.c
@@ -1034,8 +1034,18 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs)
/* Sync SLB */
#ifdef TARGET_PPC64
for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) {
- ppc_store_slb(env, sregs.u.s.ppc64.slb[i].slbe,
- sregs.u.s.ppc64.slb[i].slbv);
+ target_ulong rb = sregs.u.s.ppc64.slb[i].slbe;
+ /*
+ * KVM_GET_SREGS doesn't retun slb entry with slot information
+ * same as index. So don't depend on the slot information in
+ * the returned value.
+ */
+ rb &= ~0xfff;
+ /*
+ * use the array index as the slot
+ */
+ rb |= i;
+ ppc_store_slb(env, rb, sregs.u.s.ppc64.slb[i].slbv);
}
#endif
--
1.8.1.2