[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu for-next 1/2] cpu: Use QTAILQ
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu for-next 1/2] cpu: Use QTAILQ for CPU list |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:36:03 +0100 |
On 21 August 2013 15:12, Andreas Färber <address@hidden> wrote:
> - for (i = 0, cpu = first_cpu; i < s->num_cpu; i++, cpu =
> cpu->next_cpu) {
> + i = 0;
> + CPU_FOREACH(cpu) {
> DeviceState *cpudev = DEVICE(cpu);
> int ppibase = s->num_irq - 32 + i * 32;
> +
> + if (i < s->num_cpu) {
> + break;
> + }
> +
> /* physical timer; we wire it up to the non-secure timer's ID,
> * since a real A15 always has TrustZone but QEMU doesn't.
> */
> @@ -83,6 +89,7 @@ static int a15mp_priv_init(SysBusDevice *dev)
> /* virtual timer */
> qdev_connect_gpio_out(cpudev, 1,
> qdev_get_gpio_in(s->gic, ppibase + 27));
> + i++;
> }
It seems a bit ugly to have to both enumerate the CPUs
via CPU_FOREACH and update an index i simultaneously.
Isn't there any way to either say "give me the CPU pointer for
CPU i" or "give me the index i of this CPU" ?
(there are a few bits post-arm_pic-removal that could be
a little cleaner with one or the other of the above.)
thanks
-- PMM