[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] i2c: Match parameters of i2c_start_transfer and i2c_s
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] i2c: Match parameters of i2c_start_transfer and i2c_send_recv |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jun 2021 18:48:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 |
On 6/14/21 12:02 PM, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 6/12/21 9:33 PM, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>> This is v2 of Zoltan's patch:
>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg714711.html
>>>>
>>>> - rebased
>>>> - added docstring
>>>> - include hw/misc/auxbus.c fix
>>>>
>>>> Supersedes: <20200621145235.9E241745712@zero.eik.bme.hu>
>>>
>>> What happened to this series? I did not find it in patchew, only my
>>> original patch:
>>>
>>> https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200621145235.9E241745712@zero.eik.bme.hu/
>>>
>>> I still have this in one of my branches so I think it was not merged at
>>> the end. Could this be resurrected or should I forget about it and live
>>> with the inconsistency in parameters instead?
>>
>> I suppose it was not queued because you asked to remove the
>> "Reported-by" tag :/ I agree with you it would be nice to get this in
>> the tree
>
> I think I said only Reported-by is enough no need for Suggested-by as
> well but I don't see this as a reason to drop these patches. So maybe
> just nobody cared enough.
Ah OK now got it.
>> for good. However 1 year passed, so it might need adjustment.
>
> Should I try to rebase it or will you do it eventually?
Found the branch and clean rebase, so no change needed.
Corey, if you are busy, I could send a pull request if you provide
and Acked-by tag.
Regards,
Phil.