qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 33/33] target/ppc: Add a macro to check for page protectio


From: Nicholas Piggin
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 33/33] target/ppc: Add a macro to check for page protection bit
Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 23:29:49 +1000

On Wed May 8, 2024 at 10:15 AM AEST, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> Checking if a page protection bit is set for a given access type is a
> common operation. Add a macro to avoid repeating the same check at
> multiple places and also avoid a function call. As this relies on
> access type and page protection bit values having certain relation
> also add an assert to ensure that this assumption holds.
>
> Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
> ---
>  target/ppc/cpu_init.c    |  4 ++++
>  target/ppc/internal.h    | 20 ++------------------
>  target/ppc/mmu-hash32.c  |  6 +++---
>  target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c  |  2 +-
>  target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c |  2 +-
>  target/ppc/mmu_common.c  | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
>  6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu_init.c b/target/ppc/cpu_init.c
> index 92c71b2a09..6639235544 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/cpu_init.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/cpu_init.c
> @@ -7377,6 +7377,10 @@ static void ppc_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void 
> *data)
>      resettable_class_set_parent_phases(rc, NULL, ppc_cpu_reset_hold, NULL,
>                                         &pcc->parent_phases);
>  
> +    /* CHECK_PROT_ACCESS relies on this MMU access and PAGE bits relation */
> +    assert(MMU_DATA_LOAD == 0 && MMU_DATA_STORE == 1 && MMU_INST_FETCH == 2 
> &&
> +           PAGE_READ == 1 && PAGE_WRITE == 2 && PAGE_EXEC == 4);
> +

Can you use qemu_build_assert() for this?

>      cc->class_by_name = ppc_cpu_class_by_name;
>      cc->has_work = ppc_cpu_has_work;
>      cc->mmu_index = ppc_cpu_mmu_index;
> diff --git a/target/ppc/internal.h b/target/ppc/internal.h
> index 46176c4711..9880422ce3 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/internal.h
> +++ b/target/ppc/internal.h
> @@ -234,24 +234,8 @@ void destroy_ppc_opcodes(PowerPCCPU *cpu);
>  void ppc_gdb_init(CPUState *cs, PowerPCCPUClass *ppc);
>  const gchar *ppc_gdb_arch_name(CPUState *cs);
>  
> -/**
> - * prot_for_access_type:
> - * @access_type: Access type
> - *
> - * Return the protection bit required for the given access type.
> - */
> -static inline int prot_for_access_type(MMUAccessType access_type)
> -{
> -    switch (access_type) {
> -    case MMU_INST_FETCH:
> -        return PAGE_EXEC;
> -    case MMU_DATA_LOAD:
> -        return PAGE_READ;
> -    case MMU_DATA_STORE:
> -        return PAGE_WRITE;
> -    }
> -    g_assert_not_reached();
> -}
> +/* Check if permission bit required for the access_type is set in prot */
> +#define CHECK_PROT_ACCESS(prot, access_type) ((prot) & (1 << (access_type)))

We don't want to use a macro when an inline function will work.

Does the compiler not see the pattern and transform the existing
code into a shift? If it does then I would leave it. If not, then
just keep prot_for_access_type but make it a shift and maybe
comment the logic.

I would call the new function check_prot_for_access_type().

>  
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>  
> diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu-hash32.c b/target/ppc/mmu-hash32.c
> index b5d7aeed4e..fa4a4ced6d 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/mmu-hash32.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/mmu-hash32.c
> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static bool ppc_hash32_direct_store(PowerPCCPU *cpu, 
> target_ulong sr,
>      }
>  
>      *prot = key ? PAGE_READ | PAGE_WRITE : PAGE_READ;
> -    if (*prot & prot_for_access_type(access_type)) {
> +    if (CHECK_PROT_ACCESS(*prot, access_type)) {
>          *raddr = eaddr;
>          return true;
>      }

This does read better, and better than the check_prot() below
that it replaces too, so I like the cleanup.

Thanks,
Nick

> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ bool ppc_hash32_xlate(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr, 
> MMUAccessType access_type,
>      if (env->nb_BATs != 0) {
>          raddr = ppc_hash32_bat_lookup(cpu, eaddr, access_type, protp, 
> mmu_idx);
>          if (raddr != -1) {
> -            if (prot_for_access_type(access_type) & ~*protp) {
> +            if (!CHECK_PROT_ACCESS(*protp, access_type)) {
>                  if (guest_visible) {
>                      if (access_type == MMU_INST_FETCH) {
>                          cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ISI;
> @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ bool ppc_hash32_xlate(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr, 
> MMUAccessType access_type,
>  
>      prot = ppc_hash32_pte_prot(mmu_idx, sr, pte);
>  
> -    if (prot_for_access_type(access_type) & ~prot) {
> +    if (!CHECK_PROT_ACCESS(prot, access_type)) {
>          /* Access right violation */
>          qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "PTE access rejected\n");
>          if (guest_visible) {
> diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> index 5a0d80feda..14c2116ae7 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> @@ -1097,7 +1097,7 @@ bool ppc_hash64_xlate(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr, 
> MMUAccessType access_type,
>      amr_prot = ppc_hash64_amr_prot(cpu, pte);
>      prot = exec_prot & pp_prot & amr_prot;
>  
> -    need_prot = prot_for_access_type(access_type);
> +    need_prot = CHECK_PROT_ACCESS(PAGE_RWX, access_type);
>      if (need_prot & ~prot) {
>          /* Access right violation */
>          qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "PTE access rejected\n");
> diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c b/target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c
> index 395ce3b782..a72cd927c4 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c
> @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static bool ppc_radix64_check_prot(PowerPCCPU *cpu, 
> MMUAccessType access_type,
>      }
>  
>      /* Check if requested access type is allowed */
> -    if (prot_for_access_type(access_type) & ~*prot) {
> +    if (!CHECK_PROT_ACCESS(*prot, access_type)) {
>          /* Page Protected for that Access */
>          *fault_cause |= access_type == MMU_INST_FETCH ? SRR1_NOEXEC_GUARD :
>                                                          DSISR_PROTFAULT;
> diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
> index eff015066d..24d68926b4 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
> @@ -76,11 +76,6 @@ void ppc_store_sdr1(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong value)
>  
> /*****************************************************************************/
>  /* PowerPC MMU emulation */
>  
> -static int check_prot(int prot, MMUAccessType access_type)
> -{
> -    return prot & prot_for_access_type(access_type) ? 0 : -2;
> -}
> -
>  int ppc6xx_tlb_getnum(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong eaddr,
>                                      int way, int is_code)
>  {
> @@ -125,13 +120,14 @@ static int ppc6xx_tlb_pte_check(mmu_ctx_t *ctx, 
> target_ulong pte0,
>              /* Keep the matching PTE information */
>              ctx->raddr = pte1;
>              ctx->prot = ppc_hash32_pp_prot(ctx->key, pp, ctx->nx);
> -            ret = check_prot(ctx->prot, access_type);
> -            if (ret == 0) {
> +            if (CHECK_PROT_ACCESS(ctx->prot, access_type)) {
>                  /* Access granted */
>                  qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "PTE access granted !\n");
> +                ret = 0;
>              } else {
>                  /* Access right violation */
>                  qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "PTE access rejected\n");
> +                ret = -2;
>              }
>          }
>      }
> @@ -317,12 +313,14 @@ static int get_bat_6xx_tlb(CPUPPCState *env, mmu_ctx_t 
> *ctx,
>                      (virtual & 0x0001F000);
>                  /* Compute access rights */
>                  ctx->prot = prot;
> -                ret = check_prot(ctx->prot, access_type);
> -                if (ret == 0) {
> +                if (CHECK_PROT_ACCESS(ctx->prot, access_type)) {
>                      qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "BAT %d match: r " 
> HWADDR_FMT_plx
>                                    " prot=%c%c\n", i, ctx->raddr,
>                                    ctx->prot & PAGE_READ ? 'R' : '-',
>                                    ctx->prot & PAGE_WRITE ? 'W' : '-');
> +                    ret = 0;
> +                } else {
> +                    ret = -2;
>                  }
>                  break;
>              }
> @@ -540,9 +538,11 @@ static int mmu40x_get_physical_address(CPUPPCState *env, 
> mmu_ctx_t *ctx,
>          check_perms:
>              /* Check from TLB entry */
>              ctx->prot = tlb->prot;
> -            ret = check_prot(ctx->prot, access_type);
> -            if (ret == -2) {
> +            if (CHECK_PROT_ACCESS(ctx->prot, access_type)) {
> +                ret = 0;
> +            } else {
>                  env->spr[SPR_40x_ESR] = 0;
> +                ret = -2;
>              }
>              break;
>          }
> @@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ static int mmubooke_check_tlb(CPUPPCState *env, 
> ppcemb_tlb_t *tlb,
>      } else {
>          *prot = (tlb->prot >> 4) & 0xF;
>      }
> -    if (*prot & prot_for_access_type(access_type)) {
> +    if (CHECK_PROT_ACCESS(*prot, access_type)) {
>          qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "%s: good TLB!\n", __func__);
>          return 0;
>      }
> @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ found_tlb:
>              *prot |= PAGE_EXEC;
>          }
>      }
> -    if (*prot & prot_for_access_type(access_type)) {
> +    if (CHECK_PROT_ACCESS(*prot, access_type)) {
>          qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "%s: good TLB!\n", __func__);
>          return 0;
>      }




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]