[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v5 12/13] target/riscv: Separate pmp_update_rule() in pmpcfg_
From: |
Alistair Francis |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v5 12/13] target/riscv: Separate pmp_update_rule() in pmpcfg_csr_write |
Date: |
Wed, 17 May 2023 12:23:06 +1000 |
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 12:38 AM Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn> wrote:
>
> Use pmp_update_rule_addr() and pmp_update_rule_nums() separately to
> update rule nums only once for each pmpcfg_csr_write. Then remove
> pmp_update_rule() since it become unused.
>
> Signed-off-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Junqiang Wang <wangjunqiang@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Alistair
> ---
> target/riscv/pmp.c | 16 ++--------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/pmp.c b/target/riscv/pmp.c
> index 330f61b0f1..317c28ba73 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/pmp.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/pmp.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
> static bool pmp_write_cfg(CPURISCVState *env, uint32_t addr_index,
> uint8_t val);
> static uint8_t pmp_read_cfg(CPURISCVState *env, uint32_t addr_index);
> -static void pmp_update_rule(CPURISCVState *env, uint32_t pmp_index);
>
> /*
> * Accessor method to extract address matching type 'a field' from cfg reg
> @@ -121,7 +120,7 @@ static bool pmp_write_cfg(CPURISCVState *env, uint32_t
> pmp_index, uint8_t val)
> qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "ignoring pmpcfg write -
> locked\n");
> } else if (env->pmp_state.pmp[pmp_index].cfg_reg != val) {
> env->pmp_state.pmp[pmp_index].cfg_reg = val;
> - pmp_update_rule(env, pmp_index);
> + pmp_update_rule_addr(env, pmp_index);
> return true;
> }
> } else {
> @@ -209,18 +208,6 @@ void pmp_update_rule_nums(CPURISCVState *env)
> }
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Convert cfg/addr reg values here into simple 'sa' --> start address and
> 'ea'
> - * end address values.
> - * This function is called relatively infrequently whereas the check that
> - * an address is within a pmp rule is called often, so optimise that one
> - */
> -static void pmp_update_rule(CPURISCVState *env, uint32_t pmp_index)
> -{
> - pmp_update_rule_addr(env, pmp_index);
> - pmp_update_rule_nums(env);
> -}
> -
> static int pmp_is_in_range(CPURISCVState *env, int pmp_index,
> target_ulong addr)
> {
> @@ -481,6 +468,7 @@ void pmpcfg_csr_write(CPURISCVState *env, uint32_t
> reg_index,
>
> /* If PMP permission of any addr has been changed, flush TLB pages. */
> if (modified) {
> + pmp_update_rule_nums(env);
> tlb_flush(env_cpu(env));
> }
> }
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH v5 12/13] target/riscv: Separate pmp_update_rule() in pmpcfg_csr_write,
Alistair Francis <=