qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 12/13] target/riscv: Separate pmp_update_rule() in pmpcfg_


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/13] target/riscv: Separate pmp_update_rule() in pmpcfg_csr_write
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 12:23:06 +1000

On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 12:38 AM Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn> wrote:
>
> Use pmp_update_rule_addr() and pmp_update_rule_nums() separately to
> update rule nums only once for each pmpcfg_csr_write. Then remove
> pmp_update_rule() since it become unused.
>
> Signed-off-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Junqiang Wang <wangjunqiang@iscas.ac.cn>

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>

Alistair

> ---
>  target/riscv/pmp.c | 16 ++--------------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/pmp.c b/target/riscv/pmp.c
> index 330f61b0f1..317c28ba73 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/pmp.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/pmp.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
>  static bool pmp_write_cfg(CPURISCVState *env, uint32_t addr_index,
>                            uint8_t val);
>  static uint8_t pmp_read_cfg(CPURISCVState *env, uint32_t addr_index);
> -static void pmp_update_rule(CPURISCVState *env, uint32_t pmp_index);
>
>  /*
>   * Accessor method to extract address matching type 'a field' from cfg reg
> @@ -121,7 +120,7 @@ static bool pmp_write_cfg(CPURISCVState *env, uint32_t 
> pmp_index, uint8_t val)
>              qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "ignoring pmpcfg write - 
> locked\n");
>          } else if (env->pmp_state.pmp[pmp_index].cfg_reg != val) {
>              env->pmp_state.pmp[pmp_index].cfg_reg = val;
> -            pmp_update_rule(env, pmp_index);
> +            pmp_update_rule_addr(env, pmp_index);
>              return true;
>          }
>      } else {
> @@ -209,18 +208,6 @@ void pmp_update_rule_nums(CPURISCVState *env)
>      }
>  }
>
> -/*
> - * Convert cfg/addr reg values here into simple 'sa' --> start address and 
> 'ea'
> - *   end address values.
> - *   This function is called relatively infrequently whereas the check that
> - *   an address is within a pmp rule is called often, so optimise that one
> - */
> -static void pmp_update_rule(CPURISCVState *env, uint32_t pmp_index)
> -{
> -    pmp_update_rule_addr(env, pmp_index);
> -    pmp_update_rule_nums(env);
> -}
> -
>  static int pmp_is_in_range(CPURISCVState *env, int pmp_index,
>                             target_ulong addr)
>  {
> @@ -481,6 +468,7 @@ void pmpcfg_csr_write(CPURISCVState *env, uint32_t 
> reg_index,
>
>      /* If PMP permission of any addr has been changed, flush TLB pages. */
>      if (modified) {
> +        pmp_update_rule_nums(env);
>          tlb_flush(env_cpu(env));
>      }
>  }
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]