qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v13 06/26] target/riscv/tcg: add 'zic64b' support


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/26] target/riscv/tcg: add 'zic64b' support
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 15:00:35 +1000

On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:54 PM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> zic64b is defined in the RVA22U64 profile [1] as a named feature for
> "Cache blocks must be 64 bytes in size, naturally aligned in the address
> space". It's a fantasy name for 64 bytes cache blocks. The RVA22U64
> profile mandates this feature, meaning that applications using this
> profile expects 64 bytes cache blocks.
>
> To make the upcoming RVA22U64 implementation complete, we'll zic64b as
> a 'named feature', not a regular extension. This means that:
>
> - it won't be exposed to users;
> - it won't be written in riscv,isa.
>
> This will be extended to other named extensions in the future, so we're
> creating some common boilerplate for them as well.
>
> zic64b is default to 'true' since we're already using 64 bytes blocks.
> If any cache block size (cbo{m,p,z}_blocksize) is changed to something
> different than 64, zic64b is set to 'false'.
>
> Our profile implementation will then be able to check the current state
> of zic64b and take the appropriate action (e.g. throw a warning).
>
> [1] 
> https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/releases/download/v1.0/profiles.pdf
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>

Alistair

> ---
>  target/riscv/cpu.c         |  6 ++++++
>  target/riscv/cpu.h         |  1 +
>  target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h     |  1 +
>  target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index 86e3514cc8..b2e539f807 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -1444,6 +1444,12 @@ const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig 
> riscv_cpu_experimental_exts[] = {
>      DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>  };
>
> +const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_named_features[] = {
> +    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zic64b", zic64b, true),
> +
> +    DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> +};
> +
>  /* Deprecated entries marked for future removal */
>  const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_deprecated_exts[] = {
>      MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("Zifencei", ext_zifencei, true),
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> index d74b361be6..5fb4ca2324 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> @@ -767,6 +767,7 @@ typedef struct RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig {
>  extern const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_extensions[];
>  extern const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_vendor_exts[];
>  extern const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_experimental_exts[];
> +extern const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_named_features[];
>  extern const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_deprecated_exts[];
>  extern Property riscv_cpu_options[];
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h b/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h
> index bd2ff87cc8..90f18eb601 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h
> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct RISCVCPUConfig {
>      bool ext_smepmp;
>      bool rvv_ta_all_1s;
>      bool rvv_ma_all_1s;
> +    bool zic64b;
>
>      uint32_t mvendorid;
>      uint64_t marchid;
> diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> index aee98db6f8..3319ba8e4e 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,19 @@ static int cpu_cfg_ext_get_min_version(uint32_t 
> ext_offset)
>      g_assert_not_reached();
>  }
>
> +static bool cpu_cfg_offset_is_named_feat(uint32_t ext_offset)
> +{
> +    const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig *feat;
> +
> +    for (feat = riscv_cpu_named_features; feat->name != NULL; feat++) {
> +        if (feat->offset == ext_offset) {
> +            return true;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    return false;
> +}
> +
>  static void cpu_bump_multi_ext_priv_ver(CPURISCVState *env,
>                                          uint32_t ext_offset)
>  {
> @@ -123,6 +136,10 @@ static void cpu_bump_multi_ext_priv_ver(CPURISCVState 
> *env,
>          return;
>      }
>
> +    if (cpu_cfg_offset_is_named_feat(ext_offset)) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
>      ext_priv_ver = cpu_cfg_ext_get_min_version(ext_offset);
>
>      if (env->priv_ver < ext_priv_ver) {
> @@ -293,6 +310,13 @@ static void 
> riscv_cpu_disable_priv_spec_isa_exts(RISCVCPU *cpu)
>      }
>  }
>
> +static void riscv_cpu_update_named_features(RISCVCPU *cpu)
> +{
> +    cpu->cfg.zic64b = cpu->cfg.cbom_blocksize == 64 &&
> +                      cpu->cfg.cbop_blocksize == 64 &&
> +                      cpu->cfg.cboz_blocksize == 64;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Check consistency between chosen extensions while setting
>   * cpu->cfg accordingly.
> @@ -657,6 +681,8 @@ void riscv_tcg_cpu_finalize_features(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error 
> **errp)
>          return;
>      }
>
> +    riscv_cpu_update_named_features(cpu);
> +
>      if (cpu->cfg.ext_smepmp && !cpu->cfg.pmp) {
>          /*
>           * Enhanced PMP should only be available
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]