Re: [PATCH v2 23/43] target/riscv: Remove misa_mxl validation

[Alex Bennée]

Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 1:43 AM Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> writes:
>>
>> > From: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
>> >
>> > It is initialized with a simple assignment and there is little room for
>> > error. In fact, the validation is even more complex.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
>> > Acked-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
>> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
>> > Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
>> > Message-Id: <20231213-riscv-v7-2-a760156a337f@daynix.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>>
>> ping: along with this are the RiscV maintainers happy for me to take:
>>
>>   [PATCH v2 23/43] target/riscv: Remove misa_mxl validation
>>   [PATCH v2 24/43] target/riscv: Move misa_mxl_max to class
>>   [PATCH v2 25/43] target/riscv: Validate misa_mxl_max only once
>>
>> through my next pull request?
>
> Yep! Go for it

Sadly some of the recent changes that went through have created a merge
conflict.

Akihiko,

Any chance you could re-spin just the MISA_MXL patches?

>
> Alistair
>
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> --
>> Alex Bennée
>> Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro
>>

-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro