qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 16/22] qapi: introduce x-query-skeys QMP command


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 16/22] qapi: introduce x-query-skeys QMP command
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 16:05:05 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/2.0.7 (2021-05-04)

On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 04:02:42PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 10/28/21 17:54, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > This is a counterpart to the HMP "info skeys" command. It is being
> > added with an "x-" prefix because this QMP command is intended as an
> > adhoc debugging tool and will thus not be modelled in QAPI as fully
> > structured data, nor will it have long term guaranteed stability.
> > The existing HMP command is rewritten to call the QMP command.
> > 
> > Including 'common.json' into 'machine-target.json' created a little
> > problem because the static marshalling method for HumanReadableText
> > is generated unconditionally. It is only used, however, conditionally
> > on certain target architectures.
> > 
> > To deal with this we change the QAPI code generator to simply mark
> > all static marshalling functions with G_GNUC_UNSED to hide the
> > compiler warning.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/s390x/s390-skeys.c    | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  qapi/machine-target.json | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >  scripts/qapi/commands.py |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> > diff --git a/scripts/qapi/commands.py b/scripts/qapi/commands.py
> > index 3654825968..01d8d1ea2c 100644
> > --- a/scripts/qapi/commands.py
> > +++ b/scripts/qapi/commands.py
> > @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ def gen_call(name: str,
> >  def gen_marshal_output(ret_type: QAPISchemaType) -> str:
> >      return mcgen('''
> >  
> > +G_GNUC_UNUSED
> >  static void qmp_marshal_output_%(c_name)s(%(c_type)s ret_in,
> >                                  QObject **ret_out, Error **errp)
> >  {
> > 
> 
> I think 1/ this change should be in a separate patch,
> but 2/ Markus is not going to accept it:
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87r1haasht.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org/
> 
> I'll see if we can get ride of it with Kconfig rules.
> 
> Meanwhile, could we get the series merged without it?

Yeah, since soft freeze is today I'm going to drop the 3 patches that
touch machine-target.json, so we can debate this later.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]