qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] meson: hide tsan related warnings


From: Pierrick Bouvier
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] meson: hide tsan related warnings
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 10:43:29 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 8/15/24 04:05, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 11:12:39AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 at 23:42, Pierrick Bouvier
<pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org> wrote:

When building with gcc-12 -fsanitize=thread, gcc reports some
constructions not supported with tsan.
Found on debian stable.

qemu/include/qemu/atomic.h:36:52: error: ‘atomic_thread_fence’ is not supported 
with ‘-fsanitize=thread’ [-Werror=tsan]
    36 | #define smp_mb()                     ({ barrier(); 
__atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST); })
       |                                                    
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
---
  meson.build | 10 +++++++++-
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index 81ecd4bae7c..52e5aa95cc0 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -499,7 +499,15 @@ if get_option('tsan')
                           prefix: '#include <sanitizer/tsan_interface.h>')
      error('Cannot enable TSAN due to missing fiber annotation interface')
    endif
-  qemu_cflags = ['-fsanitize=thread'] + qemu_cflags
+  tsan_warn_suppress = []
+  # gcc (>=11) will report constructions not supported by tsan:
+  # "error: ‘atomic_thread_fence’ is not supported with ‘-fsanitize=thread’"
+  # https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/changes.html
+  # However, clang does not support this warning and this triggers an error.
+  if cc.has_argument('-Wno-tsan')
+    tsan_warn_suppress = ['-Wno-tsan']
+  endif

That last part sounds like a clang bug -- -Wno-foo is supposed
to not be an error on compilers that don't implement -Wfoo for
any value of foo (unless some other warning/error would also
be emitted).

-Wno-foo isn't an error, but it is a warning... which we then
turn into an error due to -Werror, unless we pass -Wno-unknown-warning-option
to clang.


Right, it's a consequence.

               At any rate, that's how gcc does it
(see the paragraph "When an unrecognized warning option ..."
in https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html )
and I thought clang did too...

thanks
-- PMM


With regards,
Daniel

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]