|
From: | Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Revert "hw/sparc64/niagara: Use blk_name() instead of open-coding it" |
Date: | Tue, 16 May 2023 17:08:50 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 |
On 16/5/23 10:04, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> writes:On 15/05/2023 16:11, Markus Armbruster wrote:This reverts commit 1881f336a33a8a99cb17ab1c57ed953682e8e107. This commit breaks "-drive if=pflash,readonly=on,file=image.iso". It claims to merely replace an open-coded version of blk_name() by a call, but that's not the case. Sorry for the inconvenience!Ah so was this a case of replacing something that shouldn't have been replaced in the first place, or does it require a follow-up patch?I was looking at inclusions of block/block_int*.h outside the block subsystem, and went "Oh, I can get rid of this one!" Nope, brain malfunction.
x2, sorry :/ Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reducing such inclusions is always nice, but the code this patch restores isn't broken, and no follow-up fix is required.Reported-by: Jakub Jermář <jakub@jermar.eu> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>[...]Regardless of the above: Acked-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>Thanks!
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |