qemu-stable
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/5] target/i386: mask high bits of CR3 in 32-bit mode


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] target/i386: mask high bits of CR3 in 32-bit mode
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 07:33:59 +1100
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 12/23/23 04:59, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
CR3 bits 63:32 are ignored in 32-bit mode (either legacy 2-level
paging or PAE paging).  Do this in mmu_translate() to remove
the last where get_physical_address() meaningfully drops the high
bits of the address.

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Fixes: 4a1e9d4d11c ("target/i386: Use atomic operations for pte updates", 
2022-10-18)
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
  target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>

r~


diff --git a/target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c 
b/target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c
index 5b86f439add..11126c860d4 100644
--- a/target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c
+++ b/target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static bool mmu_translate(CPUX86State *env, const 
TranslateParams *in,
              /*
               * Page table level 3
               */
-            pte_addr = ((in->cr3 & ~0x1f) + ((addr >> 27) & 0x18)) & a20_mask;
+            pte_addr = ((in->cr3 & 0xffffffe0ULL) + ((addr >> 27) & 0x18)) & 
a20_mask;
              if (!ptw_translate(&pte_trans, pte_addr)) {
                  return false;
              }
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static bool mmu_translate(CPUX86State *env, const 
TranslateParams *in,
          /*
           * Page table level 2
           */
-        pte_addr = ((in->cr3 & ~0xfff) + ((addr >> 20) & 0xffc)) & a20_mask;
+        pte_addr = ((in->cr3 & 0xfffff000ULL) + ((addr >> 20) & 0xffc)) & 
a20_mask;
          if (!ptw_translate(&pte_trans, pte_addr)) {
              return false;
          }




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]