qemu-stable
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH-for-9.0 3/4] hw/char/virtio-serial-bus: Protect from DMA re-e


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH-for-9.0 3/4] hw/char/virtio-serial-bus: Protect from DMA re-entrancy bugs
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 13:04:11 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 8/4/24 12:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 09:14:39AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 4/4/24 21:13, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Replace qemu_bh_new_guarded() by virtio_bh_new_guarded()
so the bus and device use the same guard. Otherwise the
DMA-reentrancy protection can be bypassed.

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Suggested-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
---
   hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c | 3 +--
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c b/hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c
index 016aba6374..cd0e3a11f7 100644
--- a/hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c
+++ b/hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c
@@ -985,8 +985,7 @@ static void virtser_port_device_realize(DeviceState *dev, 
Error **errp)
           return;
       }
-    port->bh = qemu_bh_new_guarded(flush_queued_data_bh, port,
-                                   &dev->mem_reentrancy_guard);
+    port->bh = virtio_bh_new_guarded(vdev, flush_queued_data_bh, port);

Missing:
-- >8 --
-    port->bh = virtio_bh_new_guarded(vdev, flush_queued_data_bh, port);
+    port->bh = virtio_bh_new_guarded(VIRTIO_DEVICE(dev),
+                                     flush_queued_data_bh, port);
---

I don't get it. vdev is already the correct type. Why do you need
VIRTIO_DEVICE here?

This function doesn't declare vdev.


       port->elem = NULL;
   }





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]