repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: at which level, is adequate licensing documentation required?


From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: at which level, is adequate licensing documentation required?
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:58:47 -0400

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > > B2.1 satisfies
  > > (and thus shadows) A3, so A3 could be removed - that would put
  > > adequate licensing documentation at the 'B' level

Proposed B2.1 talks about explaining the options offered.
Currently, A3 says to offer AGPL 3-or-later as an option.
They are orthogonal.

I see no reason for the proposed change in A3.
That would indeed make it redundant with the proposed B2.1.

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]