Re: Summary of repo-criteria changes

[Greg Farough]

On Wed, Jul 14 2021, bill-auger <bill-auger@peers.community> wrote:

> the following is a summary of the proposed changes to the GNU
> ethical repository criteria, and some additions and changes to
> the evaluated forges
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria.html
> https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html
>
> comments are encouraged - please send comments to the
> repo-criteria-discuss mailing list, with the email subject
> similar to the threads noted below as each "changes:"
>   eg: Re: [PATCH]: refer to hosts by their domain name
>   eg: Re: [PATCH]: criteria A4
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/repo-criteria-discuss

I've gone through these again and don't have any comments on the
proposed changes. If we're all in agreement, I think Bill (or I) can
go ahead and make the changes on GNU.org.

> == new proposals: ==
>
> * establish a new list, dedicated to self-hosting forge software
>   this will require a new set of criteria to be written
>
>   discussion: 
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-03/msg00031.html
>   changes:    none yet - reply to discussion thread
>
>   
> * establish a new list, dedicated to self-hosting (VPS) providers
>   this is to supplement the list of self-hosting forge software
>   this will require a new set of criteria to be written
>
>   discussion: 
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-03/msg00038.html
>   changes:    none yet - reply to discussion thread

I don't have any comments on these proposals right now, other than
that I think it's worth creating these mailing lists if they don't
already exist, so we can start thinking about criteria.

-g

-- 
Greg Farough // Campaigns Manager
Free Software Foundation

Join the FSF and help us defend software freedom: https://my.fsf.org

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature