Re: [Savannah-dev] Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: what's going on with Savannah?

[Hugo Gayosso]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Christian BAYLE <address@hidden> writes:

> > And let's not forget the security analysis done by Lorenzo proving
> > that GForge had similar security issues.
> > 
> Proof? We don't have any prooved exploit on Gforge,> we have tens of
> servers running publicly, and have never been informed of any
> exploit of a server running Gforge.

I would defer this to Lorenzo who is the person reporting the results.


> Don't reject Savane problems on Gforge, please.

That was not my intention, so excuse me if you felt offended.  

My point was that it seems that somebody chose Software A instead of
Software B allegedly because of security concerns.

Some other person performed a security audit of both Software A and
Software B and found that they were equivalent, thus invalidating the
reason given on why Software A was chosen.

Absolutely no intention to throw mud to any Software in particular.

Greetings,
- -- 
Hugo Gayosso
GNU Savannah Support
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFArCCsMNObVRBZveYRAmMzAJ9FdILwNHCuLjSRoSlxBlEKour+pgCdFSW5
/SzMsGc/t5BlFRRnsLVvbX8=
=nEOG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----