[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-users] providing libraries
From: |
Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-users] providing libraries |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:10:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Hi,
This FAQ:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#SourceAndBinaryOnDifferentSites
sounds like a:
'yes, you need to put the source code on your download area'.
As for signing, I think it's probably better to include your and the
upstream maintainer's signatures (if we test the signature files in
the download area at a point, we'll need files to be signed using keys
uploaded at Savannah, by the Savannah users).
--
Sylvain
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 07:53:49AM +0100, Andreas K. Foerster wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is a legal question.
>
> My program needs the libSDL. On GNU/Linux systems I simply assume, that
> it is already installed. But in my package for Windows I have included
> the library in binary form (.dll file).
>
> So should I copy the source-code of libSDL into my download area?
> Should I gpg-sign it myself, or is it better to pass along the
> signature of the upstream author?