[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-users] Why it seems to be no activity on Savannah?
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-users] Why it seems to be no activity on Savannah? |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Jun 2015 20:12:27 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Hello Balaco,
You have posted to the Savannah users mailing list. This is a mailing
list concerning operation of the Savannah freedom software forge. But
you are asking about Bash. Bash is a separate project. You should
write to the bash project maintainers if you want to discuss bash.
I see you have already done this. Chet Ramey the bash maintainer
responded to your message. Did you not get his response? Your
original message and his response is here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2015-05/msg00027.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2015-05/msg00028.html
There wasn't any follow-up from you in that mailing list. That is the
right place to talk about the bash project. Either to bug-bash or to
the help-bash mailing list.
Bob
Balaco Baco wrote:
> About a year ago I reported an issue that I have known Bash has since
> years ago. No clear solution seems to exist, just work arounds some do
> for their specific cases.
>
> The issue is about duplicate history lines, even with erasedups active:
>
> https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?108530
>
> My "solution" is the simple silly, but quite ashaming to say: use
> HIST*SIZE configs with muuuuch bigger values I would choose otherwise.
> But the issue makes the configuration pointless since I can't know how
> many lines of (different) lines my history really has - unless I
> carefully make/find a script or program to count it. But it should be
> the config number and that's all.
>
> The Savannah issue got no comment, pointer, or any apparent activity. So
> I decided to ask here. And the results can be everything, but no chance
> of being worse. So, why not? :)
>