[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Qt?
From: |
Svetlana Tkachenko |
Subject: |
Re: Qt? |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Feb 2021 13:10:52 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-84-gfc141fe8b8-fm-20210125.001-gfc141fe8 |
Related?
https://devclass.com/2020/01/28/qt-makes-lts-releases-commercial-only-and-accounts-mandatory-for-binaries-again/
Jan Owoc <jsowoc@gmail.com> написал(а):
> Hi Cole,
>
> On Sun., Jan. 31, 2021, 14:10 Cole Johnson, <coleharrisjohnson@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Is Qt <https://www.qt.io> considered non-free? Because it is available
> > under the LGPL 3, but their terms seem to require a project that makes
> > any money must use their paid tier.
>
>
> My understanding is that Qt uses dual licensing. If your project is able to
> comply with the LGPL terms, you can use the "free" tier. If you're making a
> proprietary program, require support, you'd need to pay to license Qt.
>
> https://www.qt.io/faq/2.5.-why-and-when-do-i-need-a-license
>
> Jan
>
- Qt?, Cole Johnson, 2021/01/31
- Re: Qt?, Jan Owoc, 2021/01/31
- Re: Qt?,
Svetlana Tkachenko <=