[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Man-writing volunteers?
From: |
Trent W. Buck |
Subject: |
Re: Man-writing volunteers? |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Aug 2008 14:53:10 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 01:20:03PM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote:
> The first step would be to ensure that the man page is in-step with the
> Texinfo manual; currently I believe the man page is a couple steps
> behind. the content is essentially the same between them, so for the
> most part you should actually be able to compare them side-by-side for
> differences. Tedious work, obviously.
Surely texinfo can be automatically converted into a roff manpage?
> Actually, though, as it stands, a big-hulking man page strikes me as
> remarkably untraditional.
The GNU convention would be to have a simple one- or two-page manpage,
which includes a SYNOPSIS and a brief DESCRIPTION and then says "use
info for the complete manual".
IMO this is a reasonable approach. How do other stakeholders feel?
- Man-writing volunteers?, Micah Cowan, 2008/08/08
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?,
Trent W. Buck <=
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Thomas Adam, 2008/08/12
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Juergen Weigert, 2008/08/12
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Thomas Adam, 2008/08/12
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Juergen Weigert, 2008/08/13
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Thomas Adam, 2008/08/13
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Stephane Chazelas, 2008/08/13
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Aaron Davies, 2008/08/15
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Thomas Adam, 2008/08/15
- Re: [screen-devel] Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Geraint Edwards, 2008/08/13