[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Screen, xterm, initialization strings.
From: |
Micah Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: Screen, xterm, initialization strings. |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:28:19 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 07:42:22PM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote:
> [...]
>> I propose that screen not send the initialization string. Probably with
>> a command-line option that specifies it should be sent (though, IMO it
>> should be sent before smkx, and not after). Any thoughts on this?
> [...]
>
> On the other hand, it seems to me that sending the init sequence
> would be the best way to ensure the terminal is in the state we
> expect it to be in.
Probably; except that we _don't_ expect it to be switched to 80-col
mode, which is apparently one of the things is2 is expected to do.
If is2 is expected to be sent at a user's login, then perhaps we should
simply expect that it's already been taken care of, as a large variety
(most? all?) of other terminal apps appear to do (with the obvious
exception of "tput init" :) ).
> But I agree doing the smcup and switching to alternate screen
> *before* doing the "init" sounds wrong.
Okay, so I'm not crazy there, then. :)
- --
Micah J. Cowan
Programmer, musician, typesetting enthusiast, gamer.
GNU Maintainer: wget, screen, teseq
http://micah.cowan.name/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIoITD7M8hyUobTrERApgJAJ4iBWCjzEYpoHIjiW+3s0lRiwxFJACfYNoi
KEnfdvCBZZL/QEgMpIu8CVc=
=j7wl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Screen, xterm, initialization strings., Micah Cowan, 2008/08/10
- Re: Screen, xterm, initialization strings., Micah Cowan, 2008/08/10
- Re: Screen, xterm, initialization strings., Stephane Chazelas, 2008/08/11
- Re: Screen, xterm, initialization strings.,
Micah Cowan <=