[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Man-writing volunteers?
From: |
Trent W. Buck |
Subject: |
Re: Man-writing volunteers? |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:18:57 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:03:43PM +0200, Juergen Weigert wrote:
> - [texinfo] just looks great, when printed on paper.
On GNU systems, at least, "man -Tps" results in a reasonably good
paper version, unless the manpage author made formatting blunders that
weren't apparent on his tty (such as using 'foo' instead of `foo').
PDFs generated in this way unfortunately don't have clickable
hyperlinks and don't have a PDF ToC; I suspect texinfo (by way of
LaTeX) wins on both those points.
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?, (continued)
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Thomas Adam, 2008/08/12
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Juergen Weigert, 2008/08/12
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Thomas Adam, 2008/08/12
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Juergen Weigert, 2008/08/13
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Thomas Adam, 2008/08/13
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Stephane Chazelas, 2008/08/13
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Aaron Davies, 2008/08/15
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Thomas Adam, 2008/08/15
- Re: [screen-devel] Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Geraint Edwards, 2008/08/13
- Re: Man-writing volunteers?,
Trent W. Buck <=
Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Micah Cowan, 2008/08/12
Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Trent W. Buck, 2008/08/12
Re: Man-writing volunteers?, Trent W. Buck, 2008/08/12