Re: [Social-mediagoblin] Fwd: Re: Templates, CSS, Images, JS, licensing

[Christopher Allan Webber]

It looks good except that CC0 isn't a license, it's a waiver of
copyright.  In places like:

  Thus we're licensing the documentation under a CC0 license as well.

It's probably more appropriate to say:

  Thus we're waiving our copyrights to documentation under CC0 as well.

I guess I could do this in a commit but I think for clarity it's more
helpful to explain that on-list, and also I'm tired and going to bed.

Thanks for doing this Will!  Aside from that, everything looks good to
me.

 - cwebb


will kahn-greene <address@hidden> writes:

> I made all the changes to the COPYING document, the license headers, and
> all that.  I also wrote up some text in the design decisions document so
> that other projects can benefit from the work we've done in regards to
> setting up the project and figuring out these important details and why
> we did what we did:
>
> http://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/blobs/master/docs/designdecisions.rst#line172
>
>
> I don't think the text reads particularly well, but I'm really tired
> right now and that's the excuse I'm going with.  I'd love to get
> feedback on how to fix it so it doesn't look like Ken Kesey wrote it
> postmortem.
>
> /will
>

-- 
http://dustycloud.org/