[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: latest spam-milter
From: |
Dan Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: latest spam-milter |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 18:08:14 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.1i |
In the last episode (Nov 18), Ron Snyder said:
> > > is SMFIS_TEMPFAIL supposed to make the program terminate and dump
> > > core (sig 6) like that ?
> >
> > No. Signal 6 is just the result of someone calling abort(). You
> > might want to run the milter without the -f flag for a while.
> > abort() will print a diagnostic to stderr before killing the
> > program.
>
> I've put spamass-milter into a loop, here's the output over the last 8
> minutes (the timestamp is associated with the line above it):
> Memory fault (core dumped)
> Mon Nov 18 15:00:06 PST 2002
(etc). Not good :(
> Here's the backtrace:
This trace looks vaguely familiar, in that according to the assembly,
it's crashing after the last line in the function. Which means it's
crashing in a C++ destructor. Wait a minute. You're that same guy! :)
I wish gdb would put correct debugging information in destructor code
so I could tell what's actually crashing.
You might want to try the CVS version if you're not already using it; I
fixed a couple of big-ish bugs this weekend relating to memory
corruption.
--
Dan Nelson
address@hidden
- latest spam-milter, Mike Tancsa, 2002/11/17
- RE: latest spam-milter, Ron Snyder, 2002/11/18
- RE: latest spam-milter, Mike Tancsa, 2002/11/18
- RE: latest spam-milter, Cowles, Steve, 2002/11/19
- RE: latest spam-milter, Cowles, Steve, 2002/11/19
- RE: latest spam-milter, Ron Snyder, 2002/11/19