[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1
From: |
Steven W. Orr |
Subject: |
Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1 |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jun 2006 09:50:29 -0400 (EDT) |
On Monday, Jun 26th 2006 at 10:00 -0500, quoth Dan Nelson:
=>In the last episode (Jun 26), Steven W. Orr said:
=>> The X-Spam-Flag: YES is set.
=>>
=>> I'm wondering if this might be part of the problem:
=>>
=>> Jun 26 09:03:36 saturn spamass-milter[4111]: Could not retrieve sendmail
=>> macro "r"!. Please add it to confMILTER_MACROS_ENVRCPT for better
=>> spamassassin results
=>
=>No, that shouldn't hurt. The "r" macro will contain either "SMTP" or
=>"ESMTP" and is just used to generate a fake Received: header that
=>matches the one sendmail will add if the message gets delivered.
=>
=>> This is my sendmail setup:
=>>
=>> INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin',
=>> `S=local:/var/run/spamass.sock, F=, T=C:15m;S:4m;R:4m;E:10m')dnl
=>> dnl INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`milter-regex',
=>> dnl `S=unix:/var/run/milter-regex/sock, T=S:30s;R:2m')dnl
=>> define(`confMILTER_MACROS_CONNECT',
=>> `b, j, _, {daemon_name}, {if_name}, {if_addr} ')dnl
=>
=>If you add another line to your .mc file:
=>
=> define(`confMILTER_MACROS_ENVRCPT',`r, v, Z')dnl
=>
=>that warning should go away.
=>
=>Ad for your mail not getting blocked, try replacing the "-r -1"
=>spamass-milter option with "-r 10" temporarily, and see if mail scored
=>above 10 gets blocked. If it is blocked, then I know the problem is
=>with the "-r -1" code.
=>
=>--
=> Dan Nelson
=> address@hidden
Dan I did some noodling last night but I'm really not good with C++. (I'm
ok with C.) I'm pretty sure that the milter is not sending a reject back
to sendmail.
Does it make sense to ask you to send me a better instrumented module to
trace what's going on in that part of the program? I was just using printf
statements but I suspect it would be better if all of the messages all
went to one place (like syslog or all to stdout). In the meantime, I'm
getting creamed here. :-(
--
steveo at syslang dot net TMMP1 http://frambors.syslang.net/
Do you have neighbors who are not frambors?
- Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1, Steven W. Orr, 2006/06/25
- Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1, Steven W. Orr, 2006/06/25
- Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1, Dan Nelson, 2006/06/25
- Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1, Steven W. Orr, 2006/06/26
- Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1, Dan Nelson, 2006/06/26
- Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1, Steven W. Orr, 2006/06/26
- Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1,
Steven W. Orr <=
- Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1, Damian Menscher, 2006/06/27
- Re: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1, Dan Nelson, 2006/06/27