[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH 1/1] revert AC_PREREQ to 2.63
From: |
Luke Yelavich |
Subject: |
[PATCH 1/1] revert AC_PREREQ to 2.63 |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:46:14 +1100 |
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:52:45AM EST, William Hubbs wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 01:54:34PM +0200, Andrei Kholodnyi wrote:
> > Exactly, it is a one line patch which fixes an obvious bug. I do not
> > understand why we discuss it the whole week now.
>
> Only because I'm confused about your answers to my questions. You said
> that ubuntu 9 needs it, but I'm not sure about ubuntu 10, which you said
> is their latest long term support release. Does Ubuntu 10 need this?
Ubuntu 9.04 is about to become end of life support wise anyway, so we shouldn't
care about it.
Luke
- [PATCH 1/1] revert AC_PREREQ to 2.63, (continued)
- [PATCH 1/1] revert AC_PREREQ to 2.63, William Hubbs, 2010/10/04
- [PATCH 1/1] revert AC_PREREQ to 2.63, Andrei Kholodnyi, 2010/10/04
- [PATCH 1/1] revert AC_PREREQ to 2.63, Andrei Kholodnyi, 2010/10/11
- [PATCH 1/1] revert AC_PREREQ to 2.63, William Hubbs, 2010/10/11
- [PATCH 1/1] revert AC_PREREQ to 2.63, Andrei Kholodnyi, 2010/10/11
- [PATCH 1/1] revert AC_PREREQ to 2.63, William Hubbs, 2010/10/11
- [PATCH 1/1] revert AC_PREREQ to 2.63, Trevor Saunders, 2010/10/11
- [PATCH 1/1] revert AC_PREREQ to 2.63, Andrei Kholodnyi, 2010/10/12
- [PATCH 1/1] revert AC_PREREQ to 2.63, William Hubbs, 2010/10/12
- [PATCH 1/1] revert AC_PREREQ to 2.63, Andrei Kholodnyi, 2010/10/12
- [PATCH 1/1] revert AC_PREREQ to 2.63,
Luke Yelavich <=
- [PATCH 1/1] revert AC_PREREQ to 2.63, Andrei Kholodnyi, 2010/10/12
- [PATCH 1/1] revert AC_PREREQ to 2.63, William Hubbs, 2010/10/13
- [PATCH 1/1] revert AC_PREREQ to 2.63, Andrei Kholodnyi, 2010/10/13
[PATCH 1/1] revert AC_PREREQ to 2.63, Trevor Saunders, 2010/10/04