Re: [Taler] How about a Non-anonymous Taler?

[MS]

Even if you *ask* the customer which way they would take
upon withdrawing coins (?):

1) Would you pay less fees but give your data away?
2) Would you pay more/traditional fees but keep privacy?

On 1/31/21 11:20 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> > For more adoption, would it therefore make sense to have the Taler
> > payment protocol support less expensive non-anonymous payments as
> > well?
> That would dilute the purpose of GNU Taler.
>
> Bruno