Just for my 2-cents,
I agree with Ekaitz, the tcc assembler syntax should follow what everyone else does so that the assembly code doesn't need to be rewritten.
For a while I was trying to add riscv32 support to tcc and hit a bunch of assembly test software that broke with the current formatting.
> I've seen it before, doesn't say anywhere that it's ratified, and the
scope mentions that it's a guide for writing assembly, not an assembler.
Since it is the guide that most people will look to to write riscv assembly, I think we should try and match it as much as possible.
Thanks,
-Sam
Soli Deo Gloria